Facing a Fundamental Problem in Prevention Science: the Measurement of a Key Construct.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Examining the Effectiveness of the WITS Programs in the Context of Variability in Trajectories of Child Development.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
   Article
2. A Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) for knowledge of parent management skills: Prototype development and preliminary psychometrics.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2020
   Article
3. Development and validation of the Knowledge of Effective Parenting Test (KEPT) in a nationally representative sample.Psychological assessment · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as