Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28091782›Full record

ReviewGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2017

Adaptation, perceptual learning, and plasticity of brain functions.

Jonathan C Horton, Manfred Fahle, Theo Mulder, Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Eye Dominance and Testing Order Effects in the Circularly-Oriented Macular Pigment Optical Density Measurements.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Mechanism of Macular Sparing.Annual review of vision science · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. 14th EUNOS Congress: PORTO, PORTUGAL, 16-19 JUNE 2019.Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press) · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Patterns of Cortical Visual Field Defects From Embolic Stroke Explained by the Anastomotic Organization of Vascular Microlobules.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2018
    Review
  15. [Current possibilities of visual rehabilitation].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan C HortonBeckman Vision Center, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Manfred FahleCenter for Cognitive Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Theo MulderRoyal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Susanne Trauzettel-KlosinskiVision Rehabilitation Research Unit, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. susanne.trauzettel-klosinski@uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2301-7687

Funding

Rapid-Prototyping and Design CoreP30EY002162 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LAKKARAJU, APARNA · 1985 to 2024
$16.8M
STRUCTURAL BASIS OF AMBLYOPIA AND STRABISMUSR01EY010217 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HORTON, JONATHAN C · 1993 to 2018
$8.5M
Structural Basis of Amblyopia and StrabismusR56EY010217 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HORTON, JONATHAN C · 2008 to 2008
$369k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002162NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010217NEI NIH HHS R56 EY010217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capacity for functional restitution after brain damage is quite different in the sensory and motor systems. This series of presentations highlights the potential for adaptation, plasticity, and perceptual learning from an interdisciplinary perspective. The chances for restitution in the primary visual cortex are limited. Some patterns of visual field loss and recovery after stroke are common, whereas others are impossible, which can be explained by the arrangement and plasticity of the cortical map. On the other hand, compensatory mechanisms are effective, can occur spontaneously, and can be enhanced by training. In contrast to the human visual system, the motor system is highly flexible. This is based on special relationships between perception and action and between cognition and action. In addition, the healthy adult brain can learn new functions, e.g. increasing resolution above the retinal one. The significance of these studies for rehabilitation after brain damage will be discussed.

Indexed as

Stroke RehabilitationAdaptation, OcularHumansLearningMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityStrokeVisual CortexVisual PerceptionAdaptationBrain plasticityMotor cortexPerceptual learningRehabilitationVisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID28091782
PMCPMC5323482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.