Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28091769›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2017

Bousquet dual mobility socket for patient under fifty years old. More than twenty year follow-up of one hundred and thirty one hips.

Remi Philippot, Thomas Neri, Bertrand Boyer, Brice Viard, Frederic Farizon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Dual-mobility cup: a new French revolution.International orthopaedics · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Remi PhilippotUniversity Hospital of Saint Etienne, Avenue Albert Raimond, Saint Etienne, France.
Thomas NeriUniversity Hospital of Saint Etienne, Avenue Albert Raimond, Saint Etienne, France. thomas.neri@chu-st-etienne.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-8793-1956
Bertrand BoyerUniversity Hospital of Saint Etienne, Avenue Albert Raimond, Saint Etienne, France.
Brice ViardUniversity Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France.
Frederic FarizonUniversity Hospital of Saint Etienne, Avenue Albert Raimond, Saint Etienne, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to analyze dual mobility cup survival rate on young patients under 50 years old at more than 20 years of follow up.

methodsOne hundred thirty seven hips with a first generation of dual mobility Bousquet cup (Serf) were included. The mean age at the time of the surgery was 41 years and the mean follow-up was 21.9 years.

resultsTwenty year follow-up cup survival rate was 77%. No dislocation occurred, 44 hips were revised (including 21 cup aseptic loosenings isolated, 15 Intra Prosthetic Dislocations), seven hips were lost to follow-up, 11 patients died, and 75 hips were still in situ.

conclusionFirst generation dual mobility cup survival on young patient was comparable with literature results. The main complications, cup aseptic loosening and intra prosthetic dislocation, were wear-related. With improvements of the defects of first generation dual mobility, we might expect an even better survival rate with contemporary DM cups.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHip JointHip ProsthesisHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateYoung AdultCement lessDislocationDual mobilityInstabilityTotal hip arthroplastyYoung patients

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.