Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28091623›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Comparative genomics of canine-isolated Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis from an endemic focus of visceral leishmaniasis in Governador Valadares, southeastern Brazil.

Hugo O Valdivia, Laila V Almeida, Bruno M Roatt, João Luís Reis-Cunha, Agnes Antônia Sampaio Pereira, Celia Gontijo, Ricardo Toshio Fujiwara, Alexandre B Reis, Mandy J Sanders, James A Cotton and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Unraveling the Genome Diversity ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular Detection ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Is leishmaniasis the new emerging zoonosis in the world?Veterinary research communications · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Phenotypical Differences betweenPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Nanoformulations withVaccines · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Subtilisin ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  19. Biology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hugo O ValdiviaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Laboratório de Imunologia e Genômica de Parasitos, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Laila V AlmeidaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Laboratório de Imunologia e Genômica de Parasitos, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Bruno M RoattUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Brazil.
João Luís Reis-CunhaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Laboratório de Imunologia e Genômica de Parasitos, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Agnes Antônia Sampaio PereiraCentro de Pesquisa René Rachou, Fiocruz, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Celia GontijoCentro de Pesquisa René Rachou, Fiocruz, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ricardo Toshio FujiwaraUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Laboratório de Imunologia e Genômica de Parasitos, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Alexandre B ReisCentro de Pesquisa René Rachou, Fiocruz, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Mandy J SandersWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK.
James A CottonWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK.
Daniella C BartholomeuUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Laboratório de Imunologia e Genômica de Parasitos, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRWellcome Sanger Institute · GBUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto · BR

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leishmaniasis is a highly diverse group of diseases caused by kinetoplastid of the genus Leishmania. These parasites are taxonomically diverse, with human pathogenic species separated into two subgenera according to their development site inside the alimentary tract of the sand fly insect vector. The disease encompasses a variable spectrum of clinical manifestations with tegumentary or visceral symptoms. Among the causative species in Brazil, Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis is an important etiological agent of human cutaneous leishmaniasis that accounts for more than 8% of all cases in endemic regions. L. (L.) amazonensis is generally found in the north and northeast regions of Brazil. Here, we report the first isolation of L. (L.) amazonensis from dogs with clinical manifestations of visceral leishmaniasis in Governador Valadares, an endemic focus in the southeastern Brazilian State of Minas Gerais where L. (L.) infantum is also endemic. These isolates were characterized in terms of SNPs, chromosome and gene copy number variations, confirming that they are closely related to a previously sequenced isolate obtained in 1973 from the typical Northern range of this species. The results presented in this article will increase our knowledge of L. (L.) amazonensis-specific adaptations to infection, parasite survival and the transmission of this Amazonian species in a new endemic area of Brazil.

Indexed as

Genome, ProtozoanAnimalsBrazilDNA Copy Number VariationsDog DiseasesDogsLeishmaniaLeishmaniasisPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID28091623
PMCPMC5238499
OpenAlexW2575471090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.