Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28091578›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Temporal dynamics of cerebellar and motor cortex physiological processes during motor skill learning.

D Spampinato, P Celnik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Acute and post-acute neurobehavioral responses to lysergic acid diethylamide in healthy subjects: a randomized controlled study.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D SpampinatoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Avenue Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
P CelnikDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Novel Strategies to Enhance Motor Function After StrokeR01HD053793 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CELNIK, PABLO ARIEL · 2007 to 2019
$5.2M
Understanding Motor Behavior After StrokeR01HD073147 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CELNIK, PABLO ARIEL · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
Understanding the physiological role of the cerebellum on human motor learningF31HD078130 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SPAMPINATO, DANNY ADRIAN · 2014 to 2016
$129k
NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD078130NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD053793NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning motor tasks involves distinct physiological processes in the cerebellum (CB) and primary motor cortex (M1). Previous studies have shown that motor learning results in at least two important neurophysiological changes: modulation of cerebellar output mediated in-part by long-term depression of parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapse and induction of long-term plasticity (LTP) in M1, leading to transient occlusion of additional LTP-like plasticity. However, little is known about the temporal dynamics of these two physiological mechanisms during motor skill learning. Here we use non-invasive brain stimulation to explore CB and M1 mechanisms during early and late motor skill learning in humans. We predicted that early skill acquisition would be proportional to cerebellar excitability (CBI) changes, whereas later stages of learning will result in M1 LTP-like plasticity modifications. We found that early, and not late into skill training, CBI changed. Whereas, occlusion of LTP-like plasticity over M1 occurred only during late, but not early training. These findings indicate a distinct temporal dissociation in the physiological role of the CB and M1 when learning a novel skill. Understanding the role and temporal dynamics of different brain regions during motor learning is critical to device optimal interventions to augment learning.

Indexed as

LearningMotor SkillsAdultCerebellumElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansLong-Term PotentiationMaleMotor CortexPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28091578
PMCPMC5238434
OpenAlexW2575641725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.