Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28091570›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Increasing the potential for malaria elimination by targeting zoophilic vectors.

Jessica L Waite, Sunita Swain, Penelope A Lynch, S K Sharma, Mohammed Asrarul Haque, Jacqui Montgomery, Matthew B Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Broadening the range of use cases for ivermectin - a review of the evidence.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jessica L WaiteCenter for Infectious Disease Dynamics and Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Sunita SwainJigyansha, International Center of Excellence for Malaria Research, Sector 1, Rourkela, Odisha, India.
Penelope A LynchUniversity of Exeter, College of Life &Environmental Sciences, Penryn Campus, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, United Kingdom.
S K SharmaNational Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR), Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi-110 077, India.
Mohammed Asrarul HaqueJigyansha, International Center of Excellence for Malaria Research, Sector 1, Rourkela, Odisha, India.
Jacqui MontgomeryEliminate Dengue Program, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, AUS.
Matthew B ThomasCenter for Infectious Disease Dynamics and Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.

Funding

Using Next-Generation Genomics to Study Antimalarial Drug Resistance in IndiaU19AI089676 · NIAID · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CARLTON, JANE M · 2010 to 2023
$22.6M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Countries in the Asia Pacific region aim to eliminate malaria by 2030. A cornerstone of malaria elimination is the effective management of Anopheles mosquito vectors. Current control tools such as insecticide treated nets or indoor residual sprays target mosquitoes in human dwellings. We find in a high transmission region in India, malaria vector populations show a high propensity to feed on livestock (cattle) and rest in outdoor structures such as cattle shelters. We also find evidence for a shift in vector species complex towards increased zoophilic behavior in recent years. Using a malaria transmission model we demonstrate that in such regions dominated by zoophilic vectors, existing vector control tactics will be insufficient to achieve elimination, even if maximized. However, by increasing mortality in the zoophilic cycle, the elimination threshold can be reached. Current national vector control policy in India restricts use of residual insecticide sprays to domestic dwellings. Our study suggests substantial benefits of extending the approach to treatment of cattle sheds, or deploying other tactics that target zoophilic behavior. Optimizing use of existing tools will be essential to achieving the ambitious 2030 elimination target.

Indexed as

Disease EradicationAnimalsAnophelesCattleFeeding BehaviorHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansIndiaMalariaModels, BiologicalMosquito VectorsSporozoites

Identifiers

PMID28091570
PMCPMC5238397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.