Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28091568›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Identification of misexpressed genetic elements in hybrids between Drosophila-related species.

Hélène Lopez-Maestre, Elias A G Carnelossi, Vincent Lacroix, Nelly Burlet, Bruno Mugat, Séverine Chambeyron, Claudia M A Carareto, Cristina Vieira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Transposable elements inMobile DNA · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Hélène Lopez-MaestreLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR CNRS 5558, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.
Elias A G CarnelossiDepartment of Biology, UNESP-São Paulo State University, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vincent LacroixLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR CNRS 5558, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.
Nelly BurletLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR CNRS 5558, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.
Bruno MugatInstitut de Génétique Humaine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UPR1142, Montpellier, France.
Séverine ChambeyronInstitut de Génétique Humaine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UPR1142, Montpellier, France.
Claudia M A CararetoDepartment of Biology, UNESP-São Paulo State University, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cristina VieiraLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR CNRS 5558, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.
Institut de Génétique Humaine · FRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRCentre Inria de l'Université Grenoble Alpes · FRInstitut national de recherche en informatique et en automatique · FRInstitut Universitaire de France · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crosses between close species can lead to genomic disorders, often considered to be the cause of hybrid incompatibility, one of the initial steps in the speciation process. How these incompatibilities are established and what are their causes remain unclear. To understand the initiation of hybrid incompatibility, we performed reciprocal crosses between two species of Drosophila (D. mojavensis and D. arizonae) that diverged less than 1 Mya. We performed a genome-wide transcriptomic analysis on ovaries from parental lines and on hybrids from reciprocal crosses. Using an innovative procedure of co-assembling transcriptomes, we show that parental lines differ in the expression of their genes and transposable elements. Reciprocal hybrids presented specific gene categories and few transposable element families misexpressed relative to the parental lines. Because TEs are mainly silenced by piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), we hypothesize that in hybrids the deregulation of specific TE families is due to the absence of such small RNAs. Small RNA sequencing confirmed our hypothesis and we therefore propose that TEs can indeed be major players of genome differentiation and be implicated in the first steps of genomic incompatibilities through small RNA regulation.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationHybridization, GeneticAnimalsConserved SequenceDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophilaFemaleGene OntologyGenes, InsectGeographyInheritance PatternsMaleMexicoRNA, Small InterferingSpecies SpecificityTranscriptomeDNA Transposable ElementsRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID28091568
PMCPMC5238404
OpenAlexW2578923749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.