Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28090753›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2017

Inferring infection hazard in wildlife populations by linking data across individual and population scales.

Kim M Pepin, Shannon L Kay, Ben D Golas, Susan S Shriner, Amy T Gilbert, Ryan S Miller, Andrea L Graham, Steven Riley, Paul C Cross, Michael D Samuel and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Inferring the disruption of rabies circulation in vampire bat populations using a betaherpesvirus-vectored transmissible vaccine.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Plague Exposure in Mammalian Wildlife Across the Western United States.Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Estimating epidemiologic dynamics from cross-sectional viral load distributions.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Kim M PepinNational Wildlife Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, 4101 Laporte Ave., Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA.
Shannon L KayNational Wildlife Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, 4101 Laporte Ave., Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA.
Ben D GolasDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Susan S ShrinerNational Wildlife Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, 4101 Laporte Ave., Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA.
Amy T GilbertNational Wildlife Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, 4101 Laporte Ave., Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA.
Ryan S MillerAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Veterinary Services, 2155 Center Drive, Building B, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Andrea L GrahamDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
Steven RileyMRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Imperial College, London, UK.
Paul C CrossU.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, 2327 University Way, Bozeman, MT, 59715, USA.
Michael D SamuelU. S. Geological Survey, Wisconsin Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, 1630 Linden Drove, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Mevin B HootenU.S. Geological Survey, Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit; Departments of Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation Biology and Statistics, Colorado State University, 1484 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Jennifer A HoetingDepartment of Statistics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
James O Lloyd-SmithDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Colleen T WebbDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Michael G BuhnerkempeDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
United States Department of Agriculture · USColorado State University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service · USImperial College London · GBNorthern Rocky Mountain Science CenterPrinceton University · USUnited States Geological Survey · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J008761/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our ability to infer unobservable disease-dynamic processes such as force of infection (infection hazard for susceptible hosts) has transformed our understanding of disease transmission mechanisms and capacity to predict disease dynamics. Conventional methods for inferring FOI estimate a time-averaged value and are based on population-level processes. Because many pathogens exhibit epidemic cycling and FOI is the result of processes acting across the scales of individuals and populations, a flexible framework that extends to epidemic dynamics and links within-host processes to FOI is needed. Specifically, within-host antibody kinetics in wildlife hosts can be short-lived and produce patterns that are repeatable across individuals, suggesting individual-level antibody concentrations could be used to infer time since infection and hence FOI. Using simulations and case studies (influenza A in lesser snow geese and Yersinia pestis in coyotes), we argue that with careful experimental and surveillance design, the population-level FOI signal can be recovered from individual-level antibody kinetics, despite substantial individual-level variation. In addition to improving inference, the cross-scale quantitative antibody approach we describe can reveal insights into drivers of individual-based variation in disease response, and the role of poorly understood processes such as secondary infections, in population-level dynamics of disease.

Indexed as

CoyotesDucksGeeseAge FactorsAnimalsAntibodies, ViralComputer SimulationCross-Sectional StudiesEpidemiologic MethodsInfluenza A virusInfluenza in BirdsLongitudinal StudiesNorthwest TerritoriesPlaguePoultry DiseasesPrevalenceAntibodies, ViralAntibodyantibody kineticsdisease hazardforce of infectionincidenceindividual-level variationinfluenzaserosurveillancetransmissionwithin-host

Identifiers

PMID28090753
PMCPMC7163542
OpenAlexW2579761076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.