ArticleJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2016
Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials: Researching the Causes of Low Accrual.
Article in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oncology Advanced Practice Provider Mentorship and Paired Clinical Research Coordinator Support to Enhance Accrual to NCI Supportive Care Trials.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2025Article
- Impact of an Oncology Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on Clinical Trial Enrollment in The US Oncology Network's MYLUNG Consortium.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2024Article
- Equitable access to oncology clinical trials: harnessing technology to reduce geographic disparities.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2023Review
- Role of Oncology Advanced Practitioners to Enhance Clinical Research.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2022Article
- Clinical Trial Participation: A Pilot Study of Patient-Identified Barriers.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2021Article
- Understanding Attitudes and Roles of Oncology Advanced Practitioners in the Setting of Cancer Clinical Trials: A Pilot Study.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2021Article
- Discordant attitudes and beliefs about cancer clinical trial participation between physicians, research staff, and cancer patients.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.