Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28090339›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2016

A mixed methods approach to improving recruitment and engagement of emerging adults in behavioural weight loss programs.

J G LaRose, K M Guthrie, A Lanoye, D F Tate, E Robichaud, L J Caccavale, R R Wing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Life events and stress among young adults in weight gain prevention trial.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Qualitative Study on Young Men's Experiences of Intentional Weight-Gain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J G LaRoseVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Richmond VA USA; Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center The Miriam Hospital Providence RI USA; Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence RI USA.
K M GuthrieAlpert Medical School of Brown University Providence RI USA; Centers for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine The Miriam Hospital Providence RI USA.
A LanoyeVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Richmond VA USA.
D F TateGillings Global School of Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC USA.
E RobichaudWeight Control and Diabetes Research Center The Miriam Hospital Providence RI USA.
L J CaccavaleVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Richmond VA USA.
R R WingWeight Control and Diabetes Research Center The Miriam Hospital Providence RI USA; Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence RI USA.

Funding

Carolina Population CenterR24HD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MORGAN, SAMUEL PHILIP · 2005 to 2014
$10.0M
Recruiting and Retaining Young Adults in Behavioral Weight Loss TreatmentK23DK083440 · NIDDK · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI LAROSE, JESSICA GOKEE · 2009 to 2013
$804k
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD050924NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK083440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEmerging adults ages 18-25 are at high risk for obesity, but are markedly underrepresented in behavioural weight loss (BWL) programs and experience lower engagement and retention relative to older adults. PURPOSE: To utilize a mixed methods approach to inform future efforts to effectively recruit and engage this high-risk population in BWL programs.

methodsWe used a convergent parallel design in which quantitative and qualitative data were given equal priority. Study 1 (

resultsWeight loss was of interest, but weight itself was not a central motivation; an emphasis on overall lifestyle, self-improvement and fitness emerged as driving factors. Key barriers were time, motivation and money. Recruitment processes should be primarily online with messages tailored specifically to motivations and preferences of this age group. Preferences for a program were reduced intensity and brief, hybrid format with some in-person contact, individual level coaching, experiential learning and peer support. Key methods of promoting engagement and retention were autonomy and choice, money and creating an optimal default.

conclusionsAn individually tailored lifestyle intervention that addresses a spectrum of health behaviours, promotes autonomy and emphasizes activity and fitness may facilitate recruitment and engagement in this population better than traditional BWL protocols.

Indexed as

Behavioural weight lossemerging adultstreatment developmentyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID28090339
PMCPMC5192532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.