Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28090106›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2016

An Interprofessional Simulation Using the SBAR Communication Tool.

Matthew Kostoff, Crystal Burkhardt, Abigail Winter, Sarah Shrader

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03117088 (Safe-SCOPE Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03117088 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Safe-SCOPE Pilot Study: Standardized Checklist Of Patient Information Exchange

TypeinterventionalSponsorRWTH Aachen UniversityRan2017 to 2017Enrolled7ConditionsQuality Assurance of Patient SafetyArmsChecklist ISBAR3, Checklist VICUR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Use of simulation for education in hospital pharmaceutical technologies: a systematic review.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew KostoffUniversity of Kansas School of Pharmacy, Lawrence and Wichita, Kansas.
Crystal BurkhardtUniversity of Kansas School of Pharmacy, Lawrence and Wichita, Kansas.
Abigail WinterUniversity of Kansas School of Pharmacy, Lawrence and Wichita, Kansas.
Sarah ShraderUniversity of Kansas School of Pharmacy, Lawrence and Wichita, Kansas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationStudents, PharmacyAttitude of Health PersonnelComputer SimulationCurriculumEducational MeasurementEducation, PharmacyHumansInterprofessional RelationsSelf ConceptStudents, NursingSurveys and Questionnairescommunicationinterprofessionalpharmacy studentsSBARsimulation

Identifiers

PMID28090106
PMCPMC5221839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.