Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28089759›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2017

Using pupil size and heart rate to infer affective states during behavioral neurophysiology and neuropsychology experiments.

Andrew R Mitz, Ravi V Chacko, Philip T Putnam, Peter H Rudebeck, Elisabeth A Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Orbitofrontal Cortex Underlies Consolidation of Pavlovian Anticipatory Arousal Responses in Macaque Monkeys.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Manipulation of interoceptive signaling biases decision making in rhesus macaques.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Interoceptive Signals Bias Decision Making in Rhesus Macaques.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The role of the amygdala in processing social and affective touch.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Interaction between decision-making and interoceptive representations of bodily arousal in frontal cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Piecing together the orbitofrontal puzzle.Behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Multidimensional processing in the amygdala.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Lesion Studies in Contemporary Neuroscience.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2019
    Review
  19. Differentiating between Models of Perceptual Decision Making Using Pupil Size Inferred Confidence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew R MitzSection on the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: arm@nih.gov.
Ravi V ChackoSection on the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Philip T PutnamSection on the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Peter H RudebeckSection on the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Elisabeth A MurraySection on the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Institute of Mental Health · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Neural mechanisms of reward processing and emotionZIAMH002886 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MURRAY, ELISABETH A · 2009 to 2025
$15.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonhuman primates (NHPs) are a valuable research model because of their behavioral, physiological and neuroanatomical similarities to humans. In the absence of language, autonomic activity can provide crucial information about cognitive and affective states during single-unit recording, inactivation and lesion studies. Methods standardized for use in humans are not easily adapted to NHPs and detailed guidance has been lacking. NEW

methodWe provide guidance for monitoring heart rate and pupil size in the behavioral neurophysiology setting by addressing the methodological issues, pitfalls and solutions for NHP studies. The methods are based on comparative physiology to establish a rationale for each solution. We include examples from both electrophysiological and lesion studies.

resultsSingle-unit recording, pupil responses and heart rate changes represent a range of decreasing temporal resolution, a characteristic that impacts experimental design and analysis. We demonstrate the unexpected result that autonomic measures acquired before and after amygdala lesions are comparable despite disruption of normal autonomic function. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodsSpecies and study design differences can render standard techniques used in human studies inappropriate for NHP studies. We show how to manage data from small groups typical of NHP studies, data from the short behavioral trials typical of neurophysiological studies, issues associated with longitudinal studies, and differences in anatomy and physiology.

conclusionsAutonomic measurement to infer cognitive and affective states in NHP is neither off-the-shelf nor onerous. Familiarity with the issues and solutions will broaden the use of autonomic signals in NHP single unit and lesion studies.

Indexed as

PupilAmygdalaAnimalsAutonomic Nervous SystemBehavior, AnimalElectrocardiographyHeart RateLongitudinal StudiesMacaca mulattaMental ProcessesOrgan SizePrefrontal CortexResearch DesignAffective stateArousalAutonomic measurementBehavioral neurophysiologyCognitive stateExperimental designFrequency domain analysisHeart rate variabilityMethodsNeuropsychologyNonhuman primatePupillometryPupil sizeTime domain analysis

Identifiers

PMID28089759
PMCPMC5346348
OpenAlexW2577578218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.