Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28089706›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2017

A sipometer for measuring motivation to consume and reward value of foods and beverages in humans: Description and proof of principle.

P S Hogenkamp, A Shechter, M-P St-Onge, A Sclafani, H R Kissileff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

P S HogenkampDepartment of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; New York Obesity Nutrition Research Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA(1).
A ShechterNew York Obesity Nutrition Research Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA(1); Institute of Human Nutrition, Columbia University, New York, USA; Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.
M-P St-OngeNew York Obesity Nutrition Research Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA(1); Institute of Human Nutrition, Columbia University, New York, USA; Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.
A SclafaniDepartment of Psychology, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, Brooklyn, USA.
H R KissileffNew York Obesity Nutrition Research Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA(1); Institute of Human Nutrition, Columbia University, New York, USA; Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA. Electronic address: hrk2@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAININGP30DK026687 · NIDDK · ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT INST FOR HLTH SCIS · PI Anthony W Ferrante, DYMPNA GALLAGHER · 1986 to 2026
$33.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK026687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New methods, derived from animal work, for measuring food reward value (i.e. reinforcing value of food), and motivation (i.e. strength of desire) to consume, in humans are described and validated. A sipping device (sipometer) was developed that permits access to a liquid food or beverage on two reward schedules: continuous reinforcement (CR) and progressively increasing time spent exerting pressure on a straw (PR-schedule). In addition, a pictorial scale showing a cup, from which the 'amount wanted' could be marked was used to pre-test potential consumption. Intake, time spent sipping, breakpoint, and pressure exerted were the main dependent variables measured. Three pilot experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, participants (n=8) consumed yogurt shakes after a 1-h or 21-h food deprivation period on both schedules. In Experiment 2, participants (n=8) sham-consumed (i.e. spit out) sweet and non-sweet beverages, utilizing both schedules. In Experiment 3, sham-consuming sweet and non-sweet beverages on both schedules and working for shake on the PR schedule were repeated, after three nights of either habitual sleep or short sleep duration (n=7) in a crossover design. In Experiment 1, participants sipped longer after 21-h vs. 1-h of food deprivation (13±3.0 vs. 8.0±2.1s; p=0.04), on the PR schedule. In Experiment 2, sham-intake (p=0.01) and sipping time (p=0.04) were greater for sweet than non-sweet beverages on the PR schedule and a similar, though not conventionally significant, effect was observed for exerted pressure (p=0.09). In both Experiment 2 and Experiment 3 after habitual sleep, on the PR schedule, cumulative pressure difference between sweet and non-sweet beverage increased with difference in amount wanted in the taste test. In contrast, after short sleep participants were less willing to work for sweet taste as their wanting increased, suggesting that sleep deprivation raises desire, but lowers behavioral output. Taken together these results demonstrate that the sipometer and associated ratings are reliable and useful measures of motivation to consume and reward value in humans. Participants were more motivated to obtain access to sweet beverages, especially when these were better liked than to obtain access to non-sweet beverages.

Indexed as

RewardAdultAnalysis of VarianceDrinking BehaviorFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood DeprivationFood PreferencesHumansMotivationPredictive Value of TestsRegression AnalysisSleep DeprivationTaste PerceptionTime FactorsVisual Analog ScaleConsummatory behaviorLiking wantingMotivationReinforcing valueReward

Identifiers

PMID28089706
PMCPMC5769686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.