Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28089376›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2017

Chemotherapy completion in elderly women with ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer - An NRG oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Vivian E von Gruenigen, Helen Q Huang, Jan H Beumer, Heather A Lankes, William Tew, Thomas Herzog, Arti Hurria, Robert S Mannel, Tina Rizack, Lisa M Landrum and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Practical Assessment and Management of Vulnerabilities in Older Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: ASCO Guideline for Geriatric Oncology.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Surgery in ovarian cancer patients older than 70 years of age and frailty assessment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ovarian cancer in the older patient: where are we now? What to do next?Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Understanding Treatment Tolerability in Older Adults With Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Review
  18. Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Performance Status Work Group.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Review
  19. Pre-operative neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles and survival in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: what is the optimal number? A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Team Ovary study.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Vivian E von GruenigenDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Summa Akron City Hospital, NEOMED, Akron, OH 44304, United States. Electronic address: vongruev@summahealth.org.
Helen Q HuangNRG Oncology Statistics & Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States. Electronic address: hquang@gogstats.org.
Jan H BeumerCancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States. Electronic address: beumerjh@upmc.edu.
Heather A LankesNRG Oncology Statistics & Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States. Electronic address: hlankes@gogstats.org.
William TewMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, New York, NY 10065, United States. Electronic address: teww@MSKCC.org.
Thomas HerzogDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Cancer Center, New York NY, 10032, United States. Electronic address: herzogt@ucmail.uc.edu.
Arti HurriaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Cancer Center, New York NY, 10032, United States. Electronic address: ahurria@coh.org.
Robert S MannelDivision of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The Peggy and Charles Stephenson Cancer Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States. Electronic address: Robert-Mannel@ouhsc.edu.
Tina RizackDept. of Gynecologic Oncology, Women & Infants Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02905, United States. Electronic address: trizack@wihri.org.
Lisa M LandrumDivision of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The Peggy and Charles Stephenson Cancer Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States. Electronic address: lisa-landrum@ouhsc.edu.
Peter G RoseDept. of Gynecologic Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44109, United States.
Ritu SalaniDept. of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States. Electronic address: Ritu.Salani@osumc.edu.
William H BradleyDept. of OB/GYN, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States. Electronic address: wbrabley@mcw.edu.
Thomas J RutherfordDept. of OB/GYN, Western Connecticut Health Network, Norwalk, CT 06856, United States. Electronic address: thomas.rutherford@yale.edu.
Robert V HigginsDept. of Gynecologic Oncology, Carolinas Medical Center, Blumenthal Cancer Center, Charlotte, NC 28203, United States. Electronic address: robert.higgins@carolinashealthcare.org.
Angeles Alvarez SecordDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC 27710, United States; Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States. Electronic address: angeles.secord@duke.edu.
Gini FlemingSection of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States. Electronic address: gfleming@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Columbia University · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USBrown University · USCarolinas Medical Center · USCleveland Clinic · USDuke Medical Center · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNRG Oncology · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USSumma Akron City Hospital · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USWestern Connecticut Health Network · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Jessie Nedrow · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI James J. Dignam · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP HEADQUARTERSU10CA027469 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP STATISTICAL OFFICEU10CA037517 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI BLESSING, JOHN A · 1985 to 2013
$67.4M
NRG Oncology Biospecimen BankU24CA196067 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Tanner J. Freeman, Nilsa Del Carmen Ramirez Milan · 2015 to 2026
$42.6M
Lead Academic Participating Site for the Development and Conduct of NCTN TrialsU10CA180798 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI MANNEL, ROBERT S., MOORE, KATHLEEN N. · 2014 to 2018
$6.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS U10 CA027469NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037517NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180798NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196067NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA simple measure to predict chemotherapy tolerance in elderly patients would be useful. We prospectively tested the association of baseline Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) score with ability to complete 4 cycles of first line chemotherapy without dose reductions or >7days delay in elderly ovarian cancer patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients' age ≥70 along with their physicians chose between two regimens: CP (Carboplatin AUC 5, Paclitaxel 135mg/m

resultsTwo-hundred-twelve women were enrolled, 152 selecting CP and 60 selecting C. Those who selected CP had higher baseline IADL scores (p<0.001). After adjusting for age and PS, baseline IADL was independently associated with the choice of regimen (p=0.035). The baseline IADL score was not found to be associated with completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy without dose reduction or delays (p=0.21), but was associated with completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy regardless of dose reduction and delay (p=0.008) and toxicity, with the odds ratio (OR) of grade 3+ toxicity decreasing 17% (OR: 0.83; 95%CI: 0.72-0.96; p=0.013) for each additional activity in which the patient was independent. After adjustment for chemotherapy regimen, IADL was also associated with overall survival (p=0.019) for patients receiving CP.

conclusionPatients with a higher baseline IADL score (more independent) were more likely to complete 4 cycles of chemotherapy and less likely to experience grade 3 or higher toxicity.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFallopian Tube NeoplasmsFemaleHumansOvarian NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsChemotherapyElderly womenOvarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID28089376
PMCPMC5570471
OpenAlexW2578431964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.