Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28088982›Full record

ReviewSeminars in hematology2017

Accumulation of DNA damage in the aged hematopoietic stem cell compartment.

Isabel Beerman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in hematology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Immune Aging in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Clonal hematopoiesis and hematological malignancy.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Hematopoietic Stem Cells and the Immune System in Development and Aging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Molecular Damage in Aging.Nature aging · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Isabel BeermanTranslational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: isabel.beerman@nih.gov.

Funding

Characterization of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) and progenitor cell aging, identification of candidate age-regulated genes as targets for therapeutic interventionZIAAG000992 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI BEERMAN, ISABEL · 2017 to 2025
$1.7M
Rejuvenation of the aged HSC compartment by reprogramming old blood cellsK01AG050813 · NIA · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI BEERMAN, ISABEL · 2016 to 2016
$124k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AG999999NIA NIH HHS K01 AG050813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging is associated with loss of functional potential of multiple tissue systems, and there has been significant interest in understanding how tissue-specific cells contribute to this decline. DNA damage accumulation has been widely associated with aging in differentiated cell types. However, tissue-specific stem cells were once thought to be a geno-protected population, as damage accrued in a stem cell population has the potential to be inherited by differentiated progeny, as well as propagated within the stem cell compartment through self-renewal divisions. This review will discuss the evidence for DNA damage accumulation in the aged HSC compartment, potential drivers, and finally the consequences of the acquired damage.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCellular SenescenceDNA DamageHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansAgingDNA damageHematopoietic stem cellsHSC

Identifiers

PMID28088982
PMCPMC5242379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.