Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28087951›Full record

Trial reportOncotarget2016

A phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and erlotinib for inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Chuanhua Zhao, Li Lin, Jianzhi Liu, Rongrui Liu, Yuling Chen, Feijiao Ge, Ru Jia, Yang Jin, Yan Wang, Jianming Xu

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chuanhua ZhaoDepartment of GI Oncology, 307 Hospital of PLA, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Li LinDepartment of GI Oncology, 307 Hospital of PLA, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jianzhi LiuDepartment of GI Oncology, 307 Hospital of PLA, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Rongrui LiuDepartment of GI Oncology, 307 Hospital of PLA, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yuling ChenDepartment of GI Oncology, 307 Hospital of PLA, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Feijiao GeDepartment of GI Oncology, 307 Hospital of PLA, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ru JiaDepartment of GI Oncology, 307 Hospital of PLA, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yang JinDepartment of GI Oncology, 307 Hospital of PLA, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yan WangDepartment of GI Oncology, 307 Hospital of PLA, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jianming XuDepartment of GI Oncology, 307 Hospital of PLA, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Academy of Military Medical Sciences · CN307th Hospital of Chinese People’s Liberation Army · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with unresectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is associated with significant toxicities that are often intolerable. Prognosis for this subgroup of patients remains poor, and new therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. We investigated the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel combined with erlotinib and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with inoperable ESCC. Erlotinib (150 mg) was administered daily for 60 days beginning at the start of radiotherapy, and paclitaxel (45 mg/m²) was administered weekly along with intensity modulated conformal radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions). The median follow-up time was 21 months. The associations between EGFR and VEGF expression and treatment outcome were evaluated. Among the 21 patients treated, the overall response rate (CR + PR) was 85.6%. The median LPFS, PFS and OS were: 17.5, 14.3, and 22.9 months, respectively. Treatment-related grade 3 toxicities included esophagitis (two patients) and hypoleukemia (one patient). Grade 4 pulmonary toxicity was observed in one patient. Patients expressing EGFR had longer PFS, while those expressing VEGF or with a history of smoking had worse outcomes. Weekly paclitaxel combined with erlotinib and concurrent radiotherapy shows promise as an effective, tolerated regimen for patients with inoperable ESCC.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyAdultAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellCisplatinCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalErlotinib HydrochlorideEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedCisplatinErlotinib HydrochloridePaclitaxelVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, humanchemoradiotherapyepidermal growth factor receptorerlotinibesophageal cancerpaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID28087951
PMCPMC5302991
OpenAlexW2416425543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.