Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28087779›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2017

Genomics of Parallel Experimental Evolution in Drosophila.

J L Graves, K L Hertweck, M A Phillips, M V Han, L G Cabral, T T Barter, L F Greer, M K Burke, L D Mueller, M R Rose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Beyond Fixation: Persistent Genetic Variation Under Intense Selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Field and Function of the Negro College in STEM 2025.Integrative and comparative biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Age-Dependent Immune Defense AgainstJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A genomic analysis of the University of Nebraska Replicated Recurrent Selection program.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. How predictable is adaptation from standing genetic variation? Experimental evolution inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

J L GravesJoint School of Nanoscience and Nanoengineering, North Carolina A&T State University and UNC Greensboro, Greensboro, NC.
K L HertweckDepartment of Biology, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX.
M A PhillipsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA.
M V HanSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV.
L G CabralDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA.
T T BarterDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA.
L F GreerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA.
M K BurkeDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
L D MuellerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA.
M R RoseDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What are the genomic foundations of adaptation in sexual populations? We address this question using fitness-character and whole-genome sequence data from 30 Drosophila laboratory populations. These 30 populations are part of a nearly 40-year laboratory radiation featuring 3 selection regimes, each shared by 10 populations for up to 837 generations, with moderately large effective population sizes. Each of 3 sets of the 10 populations that shared a selection regime consists of 5 populations that have long been maintained under that selection regime, paired with 5 populations that had only recently been subjected to that selection regime. We find a high degree of evolutionary parallelism in fitness phenotypes when most-recent selection regimes are shared, as in previous studies from our laboratory. We also find genomic parallelism with respect to the frequencies of single-nucleotide polymorphisms, transposable elements, insertions, and structural variants, which was expected. Entirely unexpected was a high degree of parallelism for linkage disequilibrium. The evolutionary genetic changes among these sexual populations are rapid and genomically extensive. This pattern may be due to segregating functional genetic variation that is abundantly maintained genome-wide by selection, variation that responds immediately to changes of selection regime.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAllelesAnimalsBiological EvolutionDatabases, Nucleic AcidDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterEvolution, MolecularGene FrequencyGenetic FitnessGenetic VariationGenomicsLinkage DisequilibriumModels, AnimalModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single Nucleotideadaptationexperimental evolutionpopulation genomics

Identifiers

PMID28087779
PMCPMC5400383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.