Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28087659›Full record

ReviewAnnals of botany2017

Plant-parasitic nematodes: towards understanding molecular players in stress responses.

François-Xavier Gillet, Caroline Bournaud, Jose Dijair Antonino de Souza Júnior, Maria Fatima Grossi-de-Sa

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of botany, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The metabolic contribution of SKN-1/Nrf2 to the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparative Effectiveness of Filamentous Fungi in Biocontrol ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Characterization of FiveInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Metabolic Analysis of the Development of the Plant-Parasitic Cyst NematodesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  20. Carotenoids from mamey (Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

François-Xavier GilletEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB Final Av. W/5 Norte, CEP 70·770-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Caroline BournaudEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB Final Av. W/5 Norte, CEP 70·770-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Jose Dijair Antonino de Souza JúniorEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB Final Av. W/5 Norte, CEP 70·770-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Maria Fatima Grossi-de-SaEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, PqEB Final Av. W/5 Norte, CEP 70·770-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlant-parasitic nematode interactions occur within a vast molecular plant immunity network. Following initial contact with the host plant roots, plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) activate basal immune responses. Defence priming involves the release in the apoplast of toxic molecules derived from reactive species or secondary metabolism. In turn, PPNs must overcome the poisonous and stressful environment at the plant-nematode interface. The ability of PPNs to escape this first line of plant immunity is crucial and will determine its virulence. SCOPE: Nematodes trigger crucial regulatory cytoprotective mechanisms, including antioxidant and detoxification pathways. Knowledge of the upstream regulatory components that contribute to both of these pathways in PPNs remains elusive. In this review, we discuss how PPNs probably orchestrate cytoprotection to resist plant immune responses, postulating that it may be derived from ancient molecular mechanisms. The review focuses on two transcription factors, DAF-16 and SKN-1 , which are conserved in the animal kingdom and are central regulators of cell homeostasis and immune function. Both regulate the unfolding protein response and the antioxidant and detoxification pathways. DAF-16 and SKN-1 target a broad spectrum of Caenorhabditis elegans genes coding for numerous protein families present in the secretome of PPNs. Moreover, some regulatory elements of DAF-16 and SKN-1 from C. elegans have already been identified as important genes for PPN infection.

conclusionDAF-16 and SKN-1 genes may play a pivotal role in PPNs during parasitism. In the context of their hub status and mode of regulation, we suggest alternative strategies for control of PPNs through RNAi approaches.

Indexed as

Plant ImmunityAnimalsHelminth ProteinsHost-Parasite InteractionsNematodaPlant DiseasesPlantsTranscription FactorsHelminth ProteinsTranscription Factorscytoprotective mechanismsDAF-16/FoxODAF pathwaydauerinsulin/IGF-1MAMP- and PAMP-triggered immunityoxidative burstphytoalexinsplant parasitic nematodesreactive speciesSKN-1/Nrf2

Identifiers

PMID28087659
PMCPMC5378187
OpenAlexW2571977572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.