Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28087658›Full record

ReviewAnnals of botany2017

Are winter and summer dormancy symmetrical seasonal adaptive strategies? The case of temperate herbaceous perennials.

Lauren M Gillespie, Florence A Volaire

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of botany, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects of fire timing and snow cover on tallgrass prairie plant re-emergence phenology, growth rate, and flowering.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Global potential distribution ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  5. Genome-Wide Identification of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Micropropagation ofBiotechnologia · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. NADES Compounds Identified inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren M GillespieCEFE UMR 5175, CNRS.
Florence A VolaireINRA USC 1338, CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier cedex, France florence.volaire@cefe.cnrs.fr.
Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDormancy in higher plants is an adaptive response enabling plant survival during the harshest seasons and has been more explored in woody species than in herbaceous species. Nevertheless, winter and summer shoot meristem dormancy are adaptive strategies that could play a major role in enhancing seasonal stress tolerance and resilience of widespread herbaceous plant communities. SCOPE: This review outlines the symmetrical aspects of winter and summer dormancy in order to better understand plant adaptation to severe stress, and highlight research priorities in a changing climate. Seasonal dormancy is a good model to explore the growth-stress survival trade-off and unravel the relationships between growth potential and stress hardiness. Although photoperiod and temperature are known to play a crucial, though reversed, role in the induction and release of both types of dormancy, the thresholds and combined effects of these environmental factors remain to be identified. The biochemical compounds involved in induction or release in winter dormancy (abscisic acid, ethylene, sugars, cytokinins and gibberellins) could be a priority research focus for summer dormancy. To address these research priorities, herbaceous species, being more tractable than woody species, are excellent model plants for which both summer and winter dormancy have been clearly identified.

conclusionsSummer and winter dormancy, although responding to inverse conditions, share many characteristics. This analogous nature can facilitate research as well as lead to insight into plant adaptations to extreme conditions and the evolution of phenological patterns of species and communities under climate change. The development of phenotypes showing reduced winter and/or enhanced summer dormancy may be expected and could improve adaptation to less predictable environmental stresses correlated with future climates. To this end, it is suggested to explore the inter- and intraspecific genotypic variability of dormancy and its plasticity according to environmental conditions to contribute to predicting and mitigating global warming.

Indexed as

EnvironmentMeristemPlant DormancyPlant Growth RegulatorsSeasonsStress, PhysiologicalPlant Growth Regulatorsclimate changedehydration tolerancedroughtfrosthormonesinductionperennial herbaceous speciesSummer dormancysurvivalwinter dormancy

Identifiers

PMID28087658
PMCPMC5314652
OpenAlexW2572174643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.