Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28087631›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2017

Jérome Chal, Charlène Guillot, Olivier Pourquié

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cellular and molecular control of vertebrate somitogenesis.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Adhesion-Based Self-Organization in Tissue Patterning.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  10. Time and space in segmentation.Interface focus · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Protocadherins at the Crossroad of Signaling Pathways.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jérome ChalStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.
Charlène GuillotDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Olivier PourquiéStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA pourquie@genetics.med.harvard.edu.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard Stem Cell Institute · USUniversité de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

Molecular Analysis of the Segmentation ClockR01HD043158 · NICHD · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI POURQUIE, OLIVIER · 2003 to 2011
$2.6M
European Research Council ERC-2009-ADG 249931NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD043158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate segmentation is characterized by the periodic formation of epithelial somites from the mesenchymal presomitic mesoderm (PSM). How the rhythmic signaling pulse delivered by the segmentation clock is translated into the periodic morphogenesis of somites remains poorly understood. Here, we focused on the role of paraxial protocadherin (

Indexed as

EndocytosisMorphogenesisAnimalsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBody PatterningCadherinsCell AdhesionCell MembraneChick EmbryoClathrinGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMesodermMiceMice, TransgenicPhenotypeProtein DomainsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCadherinsCdh2 protein, mouseClathrinPcdh8 protein, mouseProtocadherinsReceptors, NotchBoundary formationCadherinCell adhesionEndocytosisParaxial mesodermProtocadherinSomitogenesisTissue morphogenesis

Identifiers

PMID28087631
PMCPMC5312037
OpenAlexW2951806993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.