Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28087416›Full record

ArticleHearing research2017

The path of a click stimulus from ear canal to umbo.

Mario Milazzo, Elika Fallah, Michael Carapezza, Nina S Kumar, Jason H Lei, Elizabeth S Olson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Transmission of Sound to the Cochlea in Normal and Pathological Human Middle Ears.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tympanic membrane surface motions in forward and reverse middle ear transmissions.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mario MilazzoThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant' Anna, Viale R. Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera, Italy.
Elika FallahDepartment of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, 630 West 168th Street, P&S 11-452, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Michael CarapezzaDepartment of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, 630 West 168th Street, P&S 11-452, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Nina S KumarDepartment of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, 630 West 168th Street, P&S 11-452, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Jason H LeiDepartment of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, 630 West 168th Street, P&S 11-452, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Elizabeth S OlsonDepartment of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, 630 West 168th Street, P&S 11-452, New York, NY 10032, USA. Electronic address: eao2004@columbia.edu.
Columbia University · USPiaggio (Italy) · IT

Funding

Diversity Supplement to Auditory Mechanics and Cochlear AmplificationR01DC015362 · NIDCD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ELIZABETH S. OLSON · 2016 to 2026
$5.6M
OBSERVING AUDITORY MECHANICS WITH PRESSURE MEASUREMENTSR01DC003130 · NIDCD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI OLSON, ELIZABETH S. · 2001 to 2015
$4.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003130NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tympanic membrane (TM) has a key role in transmitting sounds to the inner ear, but a concise description of how the TM performs this function remains elusive. This paper probes TM operation by applying a free field click stimulus to the gerbil ear and exploring the consequent motions of the TM and umbo. Motions of the TM were measured both on radial tracks starting close to the umbo and on a grid distal and adjacent to the umbo. The experimental results confirmed the high fidelity of sound transmission from the ear canal to the umbo. A delay of 5-15 μs was seen in the onset of TM motion between points just adjacent to the umbo and mid-radial points. The TM responded with a ringing motion, with different locations possessing different primary ringing frequencies. A simple analytic model from the literature, treating the TM as a string, was used to explore the experimental results. The click-based experiments and analysis led to the following description of TM operation: A transient sound pressure on the TM causes a transient initial TM motion that is maximal ∼ at the TM's radial midpoints. Mechanical forces generated by this initial prominent TM distortion then pull the umbo inward, leading to a delayed umbo response. The initial TM deformation also gives rise to prolonged mechanical ringing on the TM that does not result in significant umbo motion, likely due to destructive interference from the range of ringing frequencies. Thus, the umbo's response is a high-fidelity representation of the transient stimulus. Because any sound can be considered as a consecutive series of clicks, this description is applicable to any sound stimulus.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaEar CanalGerbillinaeModels, BiologicalMotionPressureTympanic Membrane

Identifiers

PMID28087416
PMCPMC5348280
OpenAlexW2576113058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.