Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28086987›Full record

SynthesisParasites & vectors2017

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in cats in mainland China.

Huan Ding, Yu-Meng Gao, Yao Deng, Poppy H L Lamberton, Da-Bing Lu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Prevalence and risk factors ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Seroprevalence ofJournal of veterinary science · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Prevalence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Global Status ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Article
  18. Toxoplasma gondii in wild felides in Poland.BMC veterinary research · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huan DingDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China.
Yu-Meng GaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China.
Yao DengDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China.
Poppy H L LambertonInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine and Wellcome Trust Centre for Molecular Parasitology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, GL12 8QQ, UK.
Da-Bing LuDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China. Ludabing@suda.edu.cn.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 105614/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToxoplasmosis is caused by Toxoplasma gondii which can infect all warm-blooded animals. As the most common feline definitive host, cats play a vital role in the transmission of T. gondii. However, national estimates of the seroprevalence of T. gondii in cats in mainland China are lacking, and therefore a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to provide insight into national environmental transmission levels and potential transmission to humans.

methodsStudies published up until July 1, 2016, on T. gondii seroprevalence in cats within mainland China were searched for in CNKI, WanFang, CBM, PubMed, Embase and through the reference lists of resulting articles. The seroprevalence with its 95% confidence interval (CI) for each individual study was presented, and then point estimates and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of pooled seroprevalence were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed according to potential risk factors.

resultsA total of 38 eligible studies, published between 1995 to 2016, covering fifteen provinces and municipalities, and involving 7,285 cats, were included. The seroprevalence in cats per study ranged from 3.9 to 79.4% with a median of 20.3%. As substantial heterogeneity existed among studies, a random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled seroprevalence. The value of the point estimate seroprevalence was 24.5% (95% CI: 20.1-29.0). Seroprevalence in stray cats was significantly higher than in pet cats (OR = 3.00, 95% CI: 1.60-5.64). The seroprevalence increased significantly with cat age (P = 0.018) with 17.4% (95% CI: 7.6-27.2) in the group of ≤ 1 year old, 19.5% (95% CI: 12.7-26.3) in the group of ≤ 3 year-old and 31.6% (95% CI: 22.9-40.3) in the group of > 3 year-old.

conclusionsThe seroprevalence of T. gondii in cats in mainland China was moderate and was associated with cat ownership and age. Due to the increasing prevalence of pet cats in China and the intimate relationship between these cats and humans, this might present a significant exposure risk, particularly for China's large susceptible population. Therefore, further research is needed into the links between cat ownership and human T. gondii infection and how to reduce T. gondii exposure in humans via cat contacts and the environmental contamination with T. gondii oocysts by cats.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanCat DiseasesCatsChinaDisease Transmission, InfectiousHumansRisk AssessmentSeroepidemiologic StudiesToxoplasmaToxoplasmosis, AnimalZoonosesAntibodies, ProtozoanCatsMainland chinaMeta-analysisSeroprevalenceToxoplasma gondii

Identifiers

PMID28086987
PMCPMC5237326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.