Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28086970›Full record

ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2017

Trends, determinants and inequities of 4

Aminur Rahman, Monjura Khatun Nisha, Tahmina Begum, Sayem Ahmed, Nurul Alam, Iqbal Anwar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aminur RahmanInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh. draminur@icddrb.org.ORCID 0000-0003-1434-3883
Monjura Khatun NishaUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Tahmina BegumInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sayem AhmedInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Nurul AlamInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Iqbal AnwarInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objectives of this study are to document the trend on utilisation of four or more (4

methodsThe data related to ANC have been extracted from the BDHS data set which is available online as an open source. STATA 13 software was used for organising and analysing the data. The outcome variable considered for this study was utilisation of 4

resultsUtilisation of 4

conclusionsIn Bangladesh, the utilisation of any ANC rose steadily between 1994 and 2014, but progress in terms of 4

Indexed as

Educational StatusMaternal AgeParitySocial ClassUrban PopulationAdolescentAdultBangladeshFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMultivariate AnalysisOffice VisitsPregnancyPrenatal CareSocioeconomic FactorsAntenatal careBangladeshDeterminantsInequalityTrends

Identifiers

PMID28086970
PMCPMC5237328
OpenAlexW2578773930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.