Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28086818›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2017

Narrow band imaging versus lugol chromoendoscopy to diagnose squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Flavio Hiroshi Ananias Morita, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Edson Ide, Rodrigo Silva Paula Rocha, Julio Cesar Martins Aquino, Mauricio Kazuyoshi Minata, Kendi Yamazaki, Sergio Barbosa Marques, Paulo Sakai, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Advanced Endoscopic Techniques to Detect Prevalence of Synchronous Oesophageal Cancers in Patients with Head and Neck Cancers.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Flavio Hiroshi Ananias MoritaGastrointestinal Endoscopy at University of Sao Paulo, Rua Capote Valente n 671, Pinheiros, São Paulo, Zipcode 05409-002, Brazil. flaviomorita@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2464-1713
Wanderley Marques BernardoUniversity of Sao Paulo, Rua Maria Vidal 124, Perdizes, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01253-040, Brazil.
Edson IdeGastrointestinal Endoscopy at University of Sao Paulo, Rua Cristiano Viana 647 apto 141, Pinheiros, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05411-001, Brazil.
Rodrigo Silva Paula RochaGastrointestinal Endoscopy at University of Sao Paulo, Alameda Ministro Rocha Azevedo 373, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01410-001, Brazil.
Julio Cesar Martins AquinoGastrointestinal Endoscopy at University of Sao Paulo, Rua Teodoro Sampaio 498 apto 33, Pinheiros, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05405-000, Brazil.
Mauricio Kazuyoshi MinataGastrointestinal Endoscopy at University of Sao Paulo, Rua Cardoso de Almeida 840, Perdizes, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05013-001, Brazil.
Kendi YamazakiGastrointestinal Endoscopy at University of Sao Paulo, Rua Malebranche 99 apto 142, Chácara Klabin, São Paulo, SP, CEP 04116-160, Brazil.
Sergio Barbosa MarquesGastrointestinal Endoscopy at University of Sao Paulo, Avenida Libero Badoro 451, Bairro Jardim São Caetano, São Caetano do Sul, SP, CEP 09581-610, Brazil.
Paulo SakaiGastrointestinal Endoscopy at University of Sao Paulo, Rua Sincinato Braga 3712, Paraiso, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01323-011, Brazil.
Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de MouraGastrointestinal Endoscopy at University of Sao Paulo, Avenida Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, sexto andar, bloco 3, Pinheiros, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05403-000, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the early stage esophageal cancer, changes in the mucosa are subtle and pass unnoticed in endoscopic examinations using white light. To increase sensitivity, chromoscopy with Lugol's solution has been used. Technological advancements have led to the emergence of virtual methods of endoscopic chromoscopy, including narrow band imaging (NBI). NBI enhances the relief of the mucosa and the underlying vascular pattern, providing greater convenience without the risks inherent to the use of vital dye. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the ability of NBI to diagnose squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and to compare it to chromoscopy with Lugol's solution.

methodsThis systematic review included all studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of NBI and Lugol chromoendoscopy performed to identify high-grade dysplasia and/or squamous cell carcinoma in the esophagus. In the meta-analysis, we calculated and demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood values in forest plots. We also determined summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves and estimates of the areas under the curves for both per-patient and per-lesion analysis.

resultsThe initial search identified 7079 articles. Of these, 18 studies were included in the systematic review and 12 were used in the meta-analysis, for a total of 1911 patients. In per-patient and per-lesion analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood values for Lugol chromoendoscopy were 92% and 98, 82 and 37%, 5.42 and 1.4, and 0.13 and 0.39, respectively, and for NBI were 88 and 94%, 88 and 65%, 8.32 and 2.62, and 0.16 and 0.12, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in only specificity values, in which case NBI was superior to Lugol chromoendoscopy in both analyses. In the per-patient analysis, the area under the sROC curve for Lugol chromoendoscopy was 0.9559. In the case of NBI, this value was 0.9611; in the per-lesion analysis, this number was 0.9685 and 0.9587, respectively.

conclusionsNBI was adequate in evaluating the esophagus in order to diagnose high-grade dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma. In the differentiation of those disorders from other esophageal mucosa alterations, the NBI was shown to be superior than Lugol.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellCross-Sectional StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagoscopyEsophagusFemaleHumansMaleNarrow Band ImagingProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityEsophageal neoplasmEsophageal scquamous cell carcinomaLugol chromoendoscopyNarrow band imaging

Identifiers

PMID28086818
PMCPMC5237308
OpenAlexW2576447080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.