ArticleHarm reduction journal2017
Irish general practitioner attitudes toward decriminalisation and medical use of cannabis: results from a national survey.
Article in Harm reduction journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Characteristics of Clinical Trials on Cannabis and Cannabinoids: A Review of Trials for Therapeutic or Drug Development Purposes.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Physicians' experiences, attitudes, and beliefs towards medical cannabis: a systematic literature review.BMC family practice · 2021Pooled it
- Health professional beliefs, knowledge, and concerns surrounding medicinal cannabis - A systematic review.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Doctors' and pharmacists' perspectives on the clinical use of medicinal Cannabis: a cross-sectional study.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- Utilization of medicinal hemp: a qualitative analysis of clinicians' perspectives in Ghana.Journal of cannabis research · 2025Article
- ATTITUDES AND PRACTICE PATTERNS OF CANADIAN PHYSIATRISTS REGARDING MEDICAL CANNABIS.Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications · 2025Article
- Knowledge gap in a cross section of Irish general practitioners prescribing denosumab for osteoporosis.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- Attitudes of Swiss psychiatrists towards cannabis regulation and medical use in psychiatry: a cross-sectional study.Journal of cannabis research · 2023Article
- The Quebec Cannabis Registry: Investigating the Safety and Effectiveness of Medical Cannabis.Cannabis and cannabinoid research · 2023Article
- GP preferences for, access to, and use of evidence in clinical practice: a mixed-methods study.BJGP open · 2023Article
- Medical Students' Attitudes and Beliefs Toward Psilocybin: Does Terminology and Personal Experience with Psychedelics Matter?Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Knowledge, experiences, and attitudes of Australian General Practitioners towards medicinal cannabis: a 2021-2022 survey.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on the use of medicinal cannabis to manage chronic pain: A systematic search and narrative review.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2022Review
- Clinician Beliefs and Practices Related to Cannabis.Cannabis and cannabinoid research · 2022Article
- Exploratory Factor Analysis of Medical Students' Perceptions of Medical Cannabis Scale.Cureus · 2022Article
- Article
- To Treat or Not to Treat? Polish Physicians' Opinions about the Clinical Aspects of Cannabinoids-An Online Survey.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- A systematic review of medical students' and professionals' attitudes and knowledge regarding medical cannabis.Journal of cannabis research · 2021Review
- Polish Physicians' Perspectives on Medical Cannabis Policy and Educational Needs: Results of An Online Survey.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGovernmental debate in Ireland on the de facto decriminalisation of cannabis and legalisation for medical use is ongoing. A cannabis-based medicinal product (Sativex®) has recently been granted market authorisation in Ireland. This unique study aimed to investigate Irish general practitioner (GP) attitudes toward decriminalisation of cannabis and assess levels of support for use of cannabis for therapeutic purposes (CTP).
methodsGeneral practitioners in the Irish College of General Practitioner (ICGP) database were invited to complete an online survey. Anonymous data yielded descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages) to summarise participant demographic information and agreement with attitudinal statements. Chi-square tests and multi-nominal logistic regression were included.
resultsThe response rate was 15% (n = 565) which is similar to other Irish national GP attitudinal surveys. Over half of Irish GPs did not support the decriminalisation of cannabis (56.8%). In terms of gender, a significantly higher proportion of males compared with females (40.6 vs. 15%; p < 0.0001) agreed or strongly agreed with this drug policy approach. A higher percentage of GPs with advanced addiction specialist training (level 2) agreed/strongly agreed that cannabis should be decriminalised (54.1 vs. 31.5%; p = 0.021). Over 80% of both genders supported the view that cannabis use has a significant effect on patients' mental health and increases the risk of schizophrenia (77.3%). Over half of Irish GPs supported the legalisation of cannabis for medical use (58.6%). A higher percentage of those who were level 1-trained (trained in addiction treatment but not to an advanced level) agreed/strongly agreed cannabis should be legalised for medical use (p = 0.003). Over 60% agreed that cannabis can have a role in palliative care, pain management and treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). In the regression response predicator analysis, females were 66.2% less likely to agree that cannabis should be decriminalised, 42.5% less likely to agree that cannabis should be legalised for medical use and 59.8 and 37.6% less likely to agree that cannabis has a role in palliative care and in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (respectively) than males.
conclusionsThe majority of Irish GPs do not support the present Irish governmental drug policy of decriminalisation of cannabis but do support the legalisation of cannabis for therapeutic purposes. Male GPs and those with higher levels of addiction training are more likely to support a more liberal drug policy approach to cannabis for personal use. A clear majority of GPs expressed significant concerns regarding both the mental and physical health risks of cannabis use. Ongoing research into the health and other effects of drug policy changes on cannabis use is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.