Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28086198›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2017

Gastric adenocarinoma of the upper oesophagus: A literature review and case report.

Georgina E Riddiough, Steve T Hornby, Khashayar Asadi, Ahmed Aly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Proximal esophageal adenocarcinoma: A rare case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Esophageal Polyp Lesion in a Patient with Globus Pharyngeus Compliant.Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Georgina E RiddioughAustin Health, Department of Upper GI Surgery, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg 3084, Australia. Electronic address: griddiough@doctors.org.uk.
Steve T HornbyAustin Health, Department of Upper GI Surgery, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg 3084, Australia.
Khashayar AsadiAustin Health, Department of Pathology, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg 3084, Australia.
Ahmed AlyHead of Department of Upper GI Surgery, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg 3084, Australia.
Austin Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEctopic gastric mucosa (EGM) otherwise termed gastric heterotopia or gastric inlet patch occurs in approximately 2.5% of the population. Adenocarcinoma uncommonly involves the upper oesophagus, rarely arising from gastric heterotopia or submucosal glands. Currently, there are 58 cases in the literature of oesophageal adenocarcinoma arising within areas of EGM. To date no paper has differentiated between gastric or intestinal type adenocarcinoma. This case, which describes adenocarcinoma arising within EGM, exhibited a different immunophenotype reminiscent of gastric type glands, in the absence of intestinal metaplasia. This case should be regarded as a different type of carcinoma, consistent with a non-Barrett's oesophagus-associated adenocarcinoma. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 63year old female presented with a three month history of progressive cervical dysphagia with no associated weight loss or general malaise. Gastroscopy revealed a suspicious lesion at the cricopharyngeus. Positron emission tomography demonstrated a metabolically active primary lesion without evidence of distant disease. The patient received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by a three stage total oesophagectomy. Histology demonstrated a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma with gastric immunophenotype and background changes of gastric heterotopia.

conclusionEGM is common but scarcely biopsied for evidence of dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. Whilst malignant progression is rare it is important that endoscopists are aware of the potential. Determining the exact type of adenocarcinoma may have implications for therapeutic approaches. Recognition of EGM at endoscopy may identify patients at greater risk of developing adenocarcinomas of the proximal oesophagus, however, this relationship and the necessity for screening requires more study.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaEctopic gastric mucosaGastric inlet patchOeosphageal cancer

Identifiers

PMID28086198
PMCPMC5228095
OpenAlexW2558860195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.