Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28085927›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Community Laboratory Testing for Cryptosporidium: Multicenter Study Retesting Public Health Surveillance Stool Samples Positive for Cryptosporidium by Rapid Cartridge Assay with Direct Fluorescent Antibody Testing.

Dawn M Roellig, Jonathan S Yoder, Susan Madison-Antenucci, Trisha J Robinson, Tam T Van, Sarah A Collier, Dave Boxrud, Timothy Monson, Leigh Ann Bates, Anna J Blackstock and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Rapid detection ofHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  3. Diagnosis and control of cryptosporidiosis in farm animals.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evidence of False Positivity forOpen forum infectious diseases · 2021
    Article
  7. Foodborne Parasites Dominate Current Parasitic Infections in Hunan Province, China.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. DetectingThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Detection ofThe Korean journal of parasitology · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Dawn M RoelligWaterborne Disease Prevention Branch, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Jonathan S YoderWaterborne Disease Prevention Branch, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Susan Madison-AntenucciParasitology Laboratory, Division of Infectious Disease, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, United States of America.
Trisha J RobinsonMinnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Tam T VanCommunicable Disease Division, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Sarah A CollierWaterborne Disease Prevention Branch, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Dave BoxrudMinnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Timothy MonsonCommunicable Disease Division, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Leigh Ann BatesKentucky Division of Laboratory Services, Frankfort, Kentucky, United States of America.
Anna J BlackstockBiostatistics and Information Management Office, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Shari SheaAssociation of Public Health Laboratories, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Kirsten LarsonAssociation of Public Health Laboratories, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Lihua XiaoWaterborne Disease Prevention Branch, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Michael BeachWaterborne Disease Prevention Branch, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases · USAssociation of Public Health Laboratories · USMinnesota Department of Health · USKentucky Department of Education · USWadsworth Center · US

Funding

NCHM CDC HHS U60 HM000803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryptosporidium is a common cause of sporadic diarrheal disease and outbreaks in the United States. Increasingly, immunochromatography-based rapid cartridge assays (RCAs) are providing community laboratories with a quick cryptosporidiosis diagnostic method. In the current study, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL), and four state health departments evaluated RCA-positive samples obtained during routine Cryptosporidium testing. All samples underwent "head to head" re-testing using both RCA and direct fluorescence assay (DFA). Community level results from three sites indicated that 54.4% (166/305) of Meridian ImmunoCard STAT! positives and 87.0% (67/77) of Remel Xpect positives were confirmed by DFA. When samples were retested by RCA at state laboratories and compared with DFA, 83.3% (155/186) of Meridian ImmunoCard STAT! positives and 95.2% (60/63) of Remel Xpect positives were confirmed. The percentage of confirmed community results varied by site: Minnesota, 39.0%; New York, 63.9%; and Wisconsin, 72.1%. The percentage of confirmed community results decreased with patient age; 12.5% of community positive tests could be confirmed by DFA for patients 60 years of age or older. The percentage of confirmed results did not differ significantly by sex, storage temperature, time between sample collection and testing, or season. Findings from this study demonstrate a lower confirmation rate of community RCA positives when compared to RCA positives identified at state laboratories. Elucidating the causes of decreased test performance in order to improve overall community laboratory performance of these tests is critical for understanding the epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis in the United States (US).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntigens, ProtozoanBiological AssayChildChild, PreschoolClinical Laboratory TechniquesCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumFecesFemaleFluorescent Antibody Technique, DirectHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleAntigens, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID28085927
PMCPMC5234809
OpenAlexW2572270877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.