ArticlePloS one2017
Quantification of Plasmid Copy Number with Single Colour Droplet Digital PCR.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- The dynamic distribution of genetic tandem amplifications in a heteroresistant Escherichia coli population revealed by ultra-deep long read sequencing.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Scaling laws of bacterial and archaeal plasmids.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Universal rules govern plasmid copy number.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Deletion of pcnB affects antibiotic susceptibility in resistant Escherichia coli by reducing copy number of ColE1-family plasmids.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A robust strategy for overexpression of DNA polymerase from Thermus aquaticus using an IPTG-independent autoinduction system in a benchtop bioreactor.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Barcoded overexpression screens in gut Bacteroidales identify genes with roles in carbon utilization and stress resistance.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Identification and quantification of viableFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a PMA-qPCR method for accurate quantification of viableFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- A plasmid system with tunable copy number.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Colonization of gut microbiota by plasmid-carrying bacteria is facilitated by evolutionary adaptation to antibiotic treatment.The ISME journal · 2022Article
- A genetic toolkit for co-expression of multiple proteins of diverse physiological implication.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Article
- A statistical framework for determination of minimal plasmid copy number required for transgene expression in mammalian cells.Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Article
- A High-Resolution View of Adaptive Event Dynamics in a Plasmid.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Ts2631 Endolysin from the ExtremophilicViruses · 2019Article
- Reconsidering plasmid maintenance factors for computational plasmid design.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019Review
- A Critical Region in the FlaA Flagellin Facilitates Filament Formation of the Vibrio cholerae Flagellum.Journal of bacteriology · 2018Article
- Article
- Plasmid stability analysis based on a new theoretical model employing stochastic simulations.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacteria can be considered as biological nanofactories that manufacture a cornucopia of bioproducts most notably recombinant proteins. As such, they must perfectly match with appropriate plasmid vectors to ensure successful overexpression of target genes. Among many parameters that correlate positively with protein productivity plasmid copy number plays pivotal role. Therefore, development of new and more accurate methods to assess this critical parameter will result in optimization of expression of plasmid-encoded genes. In this study, we present a simple and highly accurate method for quantifying plasmid copy number utilizing an EvaGreen single colour, droplet digital PCR. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this method by examining the copy number of the pBR322 vector within Escherichia coli DH5α cells. The obtained results were successfully validated by real-time PCR. However, we observed a strong dependency of the plasmid copy number on the method chosen for isolation of the total DNA. We found that application of silica-membrane-based columns for DNA purification or DNA isolation with use of bead-beating, a mechanical cell disruption lead to determination of an average of 20.5 or 7.3 plasmid copies per chromosome, respectively. We found that recovery of the chromosomal DNA from purification columns was less efficient than plasmid DNA (46.5 ± 1.9% and 87.4 ± 5.5%, respectively) which may lead to observed differences in plasmid copy number. Besides, the plasmid copy number variations dependent on DNA template isolation method, we found that droplet digital PCR is a very convenient method for measuring bacterial plasmid content. Careful determination of plasmid copy number is essential for better understanding and optimization of recombinant proteins production process. Droplet digital PCR is a very precise method that allows performing thousands of individual PCR reactions in a single tube. The ddPCR does not depend on running standard curves and is a straightforward and reliable method to quantify the plasmid copy number. Therefore we believe that the ddPCR designed in this study will be widely used for any plasmid copy number calculation in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.