ArticlePloS one2017
An Activation Threshold Model for Response Inhibition.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evidence for non-selective response inhibition in uncertain contexts revealed by combined meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis of fMRI data.Scientific reports · 2022Pooled it
- Has stopping stopped making sense? Disentangling the processes elicited by complex action cancellation paradigms.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Review
- Cortical Contributions to Attentional Orienting and Response Cancellation in Action Stopping.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Towards formal models of inhibitory mechanisms involved in motor imagery: a commentary on Bach et al. (2022).Psychological research · 2024Article
- Learning to Choose: Behavioral Dynamics Underlying the Initial Acquisition of Decision-Making.eNeuro · 2024Article
- Learning to Choose: Behavioral Dynamics Underlying the Initial Acquisition of Decision Making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Proactive cues facilitate faster action reprogramming, but not stopping, in a response-selective stop signal task.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Proactive Interhemispheric Disinhibition Supports Response Preparation during Selective Stopping.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Investigating the role of contextual cues and interhemispheric inhibitory mechanisms in response-selective stopping: a TMS study.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2023Article
- Comparing anticipatory and stop-signal response inhibition with a novel, open-source selective stopping toolbox.Experimental brain research · 2023Article
- OSARI, an Open-Source Anticipated Response Inhibition Task.Behavior research methods · 2022Article
- Stopping Interference in Response Inhibition: Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Selective Stopping.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Review
- The Reaction Switching Produces A Greater Bias to Prepotent Response than Reaction Inhibition.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Age-related alterations in the modulation of intracortical inhibition during stopping of actions.Aging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reactive response inhibition (RI) is the cancellation of a prepared response when it is no longer appropriate. Selectivity of RI can be examined by cueing the cancellation of one component of a prepared multi-component response. This substantially delays execution of other components. There is debate regarding whether this response delay is due to a selective neural mechanism. Here we propose a computational activation threshold model (ATM) and test it against a classical "horse-race" model using behavioural and neurophysiological data from partial RI experiments. The models comprise both facilitatory and inhibitory processes that compete upstream of motor output regions. Summary statistics (means and standard deviations) of predicted muscular and neurophysiological data were fit in both models to equivalent experimental measures by minimizing a Pearson Chi-square statistic. The ATM best captured behavioural and neurophysiological dynamics of partial RI. The ATM demonstrated that the observed modulation of corticomotor excitability during partial RI can be explained by nonselective inhibition of the prepared response. The inhibition raised the activation threshold to a level that could not be reached by the original response. This was necessarily followed by an additional phase of facilitation representing a secondary activation process in order to reach the new inhibition threshold and initiate the executed component of the response. The ATM offers a mechanistic description of the neural events underlying RI, in which partial movement cancellation results from a nonselective inhibitory event followed by subsequent initiation of a new response. The ATM provides a framework for considering and exploring the neuroanatomical constraints that underlie RI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.