ArticleNMR in biomedicine2017
Evaluating kurtosis-based diffusion MRI tissue models for white matter with fiber ball imaging.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurobiological underpinnings of rapid white matter plasticity during intensive reading instruction.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Distribution and orientation of nerve fibers and myelin assembly in a brain section retrieved by small-angle neutron scattering.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Challenges for biophysical modeling of microstructure.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2020Review
- Retrieving neuronal orientations using 3D scanning SAXS and comparison with diffusion MRI.NeuroImage · 2020Article
- Article
- Altered Relationship between Working Memory and Brain Microstructure after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2019Article
- Measuring intra-axonal TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2019Article
- Modeling white matter tract integrity in aging with diffusional kurtosis imaging.Neurobiology of aging · 2018Article
- Modeling white matter microstructure with fiber ball imaging.NeuroImage · 2018Article
- Double diffusion encoding MRI for the clinic.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2018Article
- Characterizing intra-axonal water diffusion with direction-averaged triple diffusion encoding MRI.NMR in biomedicine · 2018Article
- Working Memory And Brain Tissue Microstructure: White Matter Tract Integrity Based On Multi-Shell Diffusion MRI.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- White matter biomarkers from fast protocols using axially symmetric diffusion kurtosis imaging.NMR in biomedicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In order to quantify well-defined microstructural properties of brain tissue from diffusion MRI (dMRI) data, tissue models are typically employed that relate biological features, such as cell morphology and cell membrane permeability, to the diffusion dynamics. A variety of such models have been proposed for white matter, and their validation is a topic of active interest. In this paper, three different tissue models are tested by comparing their predictions for a specific microstructural parameter to a value measured independently with a recently proposed dMRI method known as fiber ball imaging (FBI). The three tissue models are all constructed with the diffusion and kurtosis tensors, and they are hence compatible with diffusional kurtosis imaging. Nevertheless, the models differ significantly in their details and predictions. For voxels with fractional anisotropies (FAs) exceeding 0.5, all three are reasonably consistent with FBI. However, for lower FA values, one of these, called the white matter tract integrity (WMTI) model, is found to be in much better accord with FBI than the other two, suggesting that the WMTI model has a broader range of applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.