Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28085156›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2017

Divergent functional isoforms drive niche specialisation for nutrient acquisition and use in rumen microbiome.

Francesco Rubino, Ciara Carberry, Sinéad M Waters, David Kenny, Matthew S McCabe, Christopher J Creevey

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characterizing the Fermentation of Oat Grass (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Colonization and development of the gut microbiome in calves.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  19. Oral administration ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco RubinoInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9090-6794
Ciara CarberryAnimal and Bioscience Research Department, Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co., Meath, Ireland.
Sinéad M WatersAnimal and Bioscience Research Department, Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co., Meath, Ireland.
David KennyAnimal and Bioscience Research Department, Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co., Meath, Ireland.
Matthew S McCabeAnimal and Bioscience Research Department, Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co., Meath, Ireland.
Christopher J CreeveyInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK.
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IEAberystwyth University · GBUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E/W/10964A01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many microbes in complex competitive environments share genes for acquiring and utilising nutrients, questioning whether niche specialisation exists and if so, how it is maintained. We investigated the genomic signatures of niche specialisation in the rumen microbiome, a highly competitive, anaerobic environment, with limited nutrient availability determined by the biomass consumed by the host. We generated individual metagenomic libraries from 14 cows fed an ad libitum diet of grass silage and calculated functional isoform diversity for each microbial gene identified. The animal replicates were used to calculate confidence intervals to test for differences in diversity of functional isoforms between microbes that may drive niche specialisation. We identified 153 genes with significant differences in functional isoform diversity between the two most abundant bacterial genera in the rumen (Prevotella and Clostridium). We found Prevotella possesses a more diverse range of isoforms capable of degrading hemicellulose, whereas Clostridium for cellulose. Furthermore, significant differences were observed in key metabolic processes indicating that isoform diversity plays an important role in maintaining their niche specialisation. The methods presented represent a novel approach for untangling complex interactions between microorganisms in natural environments and have resulted in an expanded catalogue of gene targets central to rumen cellulosic biomass degradation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaCattleDigestionFemaleMetagenomicsMicrobiotaRumen

Identifiers

PMID28085156
PMCPMC5364355
OpenAlexW2577373560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.