ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2017
Bioactive Nanocomposites for Tissue Repair and Regeneration: A Review.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nanomaterials Modulating the Fate of Dental-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Involved in Oral Tissue Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Pooled it
- 3D-Bioprinted Multifunctional Nanocomposite Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone-Periodontal Ligament-Root Cementum Regeneration: A Narrative Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Application and prospects of nanomaterials in osteoporosis treatment.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Role of the immune microenvironment in bone regeneration and progress in immune-modulating bone nanobiomaterials.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2026Review
- Metal-Based Regenerative Strategies for Peripheral Nerve Injuries: From Biodegradable Ion Source to Stable Conductive Implants.Biomaterials research · 2025Review
- Nanotherapeutic and Nano-Bio Interface for Regeneration and Healing.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Biocomposite Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: Materials, Fabrication Techniques and Future Directions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Assessment of laser-synthesized Si nanoparticle effects on myoblast motility, proliferation and differentiation: towards potential tissue engineering applications.Nanoscale advances · 2024Article
- Comparative study of physical-chemical properties of bioactive glass ionomer cement.Brazilian dental journal · 2024Article
- Scaffold Using Chitosan, Agarose, Cellulose, Dextran and Protein for Tissue Engineering-A Review.Polymers · 2023Review
- Recent Developments in Polymer Nanocomposites for Bone Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Electrospinning Inorganic Nanomaterials to Fabricate Bionanocomposites for Soft and Hard Tissue Repair.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- In Situ Synthesis of AZO-Np in Guar Gum/PVOH Composite Fiber Mats for Potential Bactericidal Release.Polymers · 2022Article
- Development of Biodegradable/Biocompatible Nanoliposome-Encapsulated Antimicrobial Essential Oils for Topical Creams and Gels.ACS omega · 2022Article
- Inorganic Nanomaterials in Tissue Engineering.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Micro/Nanosystems for Magnetic Targeted Delivery of Bioagents.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Engineered Nanotechnology: An Effective Therapeutic Platform for the Chronic Cutaneous Wound.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Recent Advances in Nano-Formulations for Skin Wound Repair Applications.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022Review
- Advances in Use of Nanomaterials for Musculoskeletal Regeneration.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Chitosan oligosaccharides packaged into rat adipose mesenchymal stem cells-derived extracellular vesicles facilitating cartilage injury repair and alleviating osteoarthritis.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review presents scientific findings concerning the use of bioactive nanocomposites in the field of tissue repair and regeneration. Bioactivity is the ability of a material to incite a specific biological reaction, usually at the boundary of the material. Nanocomposites have been shown to be ideal bioactive materials due the many biological interfaces and structures operating at the nanoscale. This has resulted in many researchers investigating nanocomposites for use in bioapplications. Nanocomposites encompass a number of different structures, incorporating organic-inorganic, inorganic-inorganic and bioinorganic nanomaterials and based upon ceramic, metallic or polymeric materials. This enables a wide range of properties to be incorporated into nanocomposite materials, such as magnetic properties, MR imaging contrast or drug delivery, and even a combination of these properties. Much of the classical research was focused on bone regeneration, however, recent advances have enabled further use in soft tissue body sites too. Despite recent technological advances, more research is needed to further understand the long-term biocompatibility impact of the use of nanoparticles within the human body.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.