Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28084830›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2017

Simplification of a Septic Shock Endotyping Strategy for Clinical Application.

Hector R Wong, Timothy E Sweeney, Christopher J Lindsell

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Precision diagnostics in children.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Prognostic and predictive enrichment in sepsis.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2020
    Review
  14. Precision medicine in pediatric sepsis.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2019
    Review
  15. Sepsis Biomarkers.Journal of pediatric intensive care · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hector R Wong1 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0001-7989-1173
Timothy E Sweeney4 Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto, California.ORCID 0000-0002-3596-1093
Christopher J Lindsell3 University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati, Ohio and.ORCID 0000-0002-3297-2811

Funding

Novel diagnostic and stratification tools for septic shockR01GM108025 · NIGMS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI WONG, HECTOR R. · 2014 to 2017
$2.3M
Stratification of pediatric septic shockR01GM099773 · NIGMS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI WONG, HECTOR R. · 2012 to 2015
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099773NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

GenotypeGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VariationHumansShock, Septic

Identifiers

PMID28084830
PMCPMC5394789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.