ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2017
Sigmoid resection for diverticulitis is more difficult than for malignancies.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Training curriculum in minimally invasive emergency digestive surgery: 2022 WSES position paper.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2023Review
- Change point analysis validation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Experience from a non-structured training setting.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022Article
- Robotic-assisted surgery for complicated and non-complicated diverticulitis: a single-surgeon case series.Journal of robotic surgery · 2019Article
- Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis is rarely a suitable case for the initial phase of the learning curve.International journal of colorectal disease · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSigmoid resection for diverticulitis is usually the first procedure performed when starting the learning process for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the difficulty of laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis in comparison to sigmoid malignancy in order to assess its role in the residents training program.
methodsA cohort of patients was selected who suffered either from malignancy or recurrent diverticulitis in the sigmoid colon. Laparoscopic sigmoid resection was performed. The degree of difficulty was assessed by intraoperative complications and intraoperative technical challenges. Furthermore, take-overs from assistant to surgeon, surgeon to surgeon, and conversion were reported.
resultsA total of 224 patients were included, 119 (53.1%) men and 105 (46.9%) women. Patients suffering from diverticulitis had significantly less co-morbidities than those with malignancies. In the diverticulitis group, there were significantly more technical challenges. There was a higher rate in take-overs from residents (p = 0.02) as well as surgeon to surgeon (p = 0.04). The rate of conversions was also significantly higher in the diverticulitis group (p = 0.03) when compared to the malignancy group.
conclusionsThe outcomes of our study show that diverticulitis may not be the ideal condition to start the learning process for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28084549What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.