ArticleScientific reports2017
Repair of osteochondral defects with in vitro engineered cartilage based on autologous bone marrow stromal cells in a swine model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Material-Assisted Strategies for Osteochondral Defect Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Pooled it
- Chondrogenic Differentiation of Stem Cells for Cartilage Regeneration: Advances and Future Perspectives.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of MSC-Secretome Effects in an Ex Vivo Compartmentalized Osteochondral Interface Model.Stem cells international · 2026Article
- Chondrogenic Maturation Governs hMSC Mechanoresponsiveness to Dynamic Compression.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Osteochondral tissue engineering‑based subchondral bone plate repair (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2025Review
- Current trends in the treatment of focal cartilage lesions: a comprehensive review.EFORT open reviews · 2025Review
- Cartilage Tissue Engineering in Multilayer Tissue Regeneration.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Effect of collagen-based scaffolds with hydroxyapatite on the repair of cartilage defects in the rabbit knee joint.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Cell Proliferation, Chondrogenic Differentiation, and Cartilaginous Tissue Formation in Recombinant Silk Fibroin with Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Binding Peptide.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- High-precision bioactive scaffold with dECM and extracellular vesicles targeting 4E-BP inhibition for cartilage injury repair.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Osteochondral tissue engineering in translational practice: histological assessments and scoring systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Selenium-modified bone cement promotes osteoporotic bone defect repair in ovariectomized rats by restoring GPx1-mediated mitochondrial antioxidant functions.Regenerative biomaterials · 2023Article
- Time-Dependent Anabolic Response of hMSC-Derived Cartilage Grafts to Hydrostatic Pressure.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2023Article
- Chondrogenic medium in combination with a c-Jun N-terminal kinase inhibitor mediates engineered cartilage regeneration by regulating matrix metabolism and cell proliferation.Regenerative biomaterials · 2023Article
- Within or Without You? A Perspective Comparing In Situ and Ex Situ Tissue Engineering Strategies for Articular Cartilage Repair.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Article
- Strategies to Convert Cells into Hyaline Cartilage: Magic Spells for Adult Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Dominant role ofBioactive materials · 2022Article
- Acellular cartilage matrix biomimetic scaffold with immediate enrichment of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells to repair articular cartilage defects.Materials today. Bio · 2022Article
- Instructive cartilage regeneration modalities with advanced therapeutic implantations under abnormal conditions.Bioactive materials · 2022Review
- High-precision, gelatin-based, hybrid, bilayer scaffolds using melt electro-writing to repair cartilage injury.Bioactive materials · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional reconstruction of large osteochondral defects is always a major challenge in articular surgery. Some studies have reported the feasibility of repairing articular osteochondral defects using bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) and biodegradable scaffolds. However, no significant breakthroughs have been achieved in clinical translation due to the instability of in vivo cartilage regeneration based on direct cell-scaffold construct implantation. To overcome the disadvantages of direct cell-scaffold construct implantation, the current study proposed an in vitro cartilage regeneration strategy, providing relatively mature cartilage-like tissue with superior mechanical properties. Our strategy involved in vitro cartilage engineering, repair of osteochondral defects, and evaluation of in vivo repair efficacy. The results demonstrated that BMSC engineered cartilage in vitro (BEC-vitro) presented a time-depended maturation process. The implantation of BEC-vitro alone could successfully realize tissue-specific repair of osteochondral defects with both cartilage and subchondral bone. Furthermore, the maturity level of BEC-vitro had significant influence on the repaired results. These results indicated that in vitro cartilage regeneration using BMSCs is a promising strategy for functional reconstruction of osteochondral defect, thus promoting the clinical translation of cartilage regeneration techniques incorporating BMSCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.