Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28084344›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2017

MCM2: An alternative to Ki-67 for measuring breast cancer cell proliferation.

Einas M Yousef, Daniela Furrer, David L Laperriere, Muhammad R Tahir, Sylvie Mader, Caroline Diorio, Louis A Gaboury

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Prognostic and Clinical Significance of the Proliferation Marker MCM7 in Breast Cancer.Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Einas M YousefInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Daniela FurrerCancer Research Centre at Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
David L LaperriereInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Muhammad R TahirThe University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sylvie MaderInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Caroline DiorioCancer Research Centre at Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Louis A GabouryInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer · CAHôpital du Saint-Sacrement · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease comprising a diversity of tumor subtypes that manifest themselves in a wide variety of clinical, pathological, and molecular features. One important subset, luminal breast cancers, comprises two clinically distinct subtypes luminal A and B each of them endowed with its own genetic program of differentiation and proliferation. Luminal breast cancers were operationally defined as follows: Luminal A: ER+, PR+, HER2-, Ki-67<14% and Luminal B: ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-,Ki-67≥14% or, alternatively ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+, any Ki-67. There is currently a need for a clinically robust and validated immunohistochemical assay that can help distinguish between luminal A and B breast cancer. MCM2 is a family member of the minichromosome maintenance protein complex whose role in DNA replication and cell proliferation is firmly established. As MCM2 appears to be an attractive alternative to Ki-67, we sought to study the expression of MCM2 and Ki-67 in different histological grades and molecular subtypes of breast cancer focusing primarily on ER-positive tumors. MCM2 and Ki-67 mRNA expression were studied using in silico analysis of available DNA microarray and RNA-sequencing data of human breast cancer. We next used immunohistochemistry to evaluate protein expression of MCM2 and Ki-67 on tissue microarrays of invasive breast carcinoma. We found that MCM2 and Ki-67 are highly expressed in breast tumors of high histological grades, comprising clinically aggressive tumors such as triple-negative, HER2-positive and luminal B subtypes. MCM2 expression was detected at higher levels than that of Ki-67 in normal breast tissues and in breast cancers. The bimodal distribution of MCM2 scores in ER+/HER2- breast tumors led to the identification of two distinct subgroups with different relapse-free survival rates. In conclusion, MCM2 expression can help sorting out two clinically important subsets of luminal breast cancer whose treatment and clinical outcomes are likely to diverge.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCell ProliferationDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKi-67 AntigenMinichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2Neoplasm GradingBiomarkers, TumorKi-67 AntigenMCM2 protein, humanMinichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2

Identifiers

PMID28084344
OpenAlexW2576572317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.