Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28084333›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2017

Male breast cancer precursor lesions: analysis of the EORTC 10085/TBCRC/BIG/NABCG International Male Breast Cancer Program.

Shusma C Doebar, Leen Slaets, Fatima Cardoso, Sharon H Giordano, John Ms Bartlett, Konstantinos Tryfonidis, Nizet H Dijkstra, Caroline P Schröder, Christi J van Asperen, Barbro Linderholm and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Male breast cancer: an update.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Male breast cancer: a disease distinct from female breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. X chromosome gain is related to increased androgen receptor expression in male breast cancer.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2018
    Article
  18. Preferential expression of NY-BR-1 and GATA-3 in male breast cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Male Breast Cancer in the Age of Genetic Testing: An Opportunity for Early Detection, Tailored Therapy, and Surveillance.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Shusma C DoebarDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Leen SlaetsThe European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
Fatima CardosoBreast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sharon H GiordanoDepartments of Health Services Research and Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
John Ms BartlettTransformative Pathology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada & University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Konstantinos TryfonidisThe European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
Nizet H DijkstraBOOG Study Center/Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline P SchröderDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Christi J van AsperenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Barbro LinderholmDepartment of Oncology, Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kim BensteadDepartment of Oncology, Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire, UK.
Winan Nm DinjensDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ronald van MarionDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul J van DiestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
John Wm MartensDepartment of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Carolien Hm van DeurzenDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer · BEChampalimaud Foundation · PTCheltenham General Hospital · GBLeiden University Medical Center · NLOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CASahlgrenska University Hospital · SEThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In men, data regarding breast cancer carcinogenesis are limited. The aim of our study was to describe the presence of precursor lesions adjacent to invasive male breast cancer, in order to increase our understanding of carcinogenesis in these patients. Central pathology review was performed for 1328 male breast cancer patients, registered in the retrospective joint analysis of the International Male Breast Cancer Program, which included the presence and type of breast cancer precursor lesions. In a subset, invasive breast cancer was compared with the adjacent precursor lesion by immunohistochemistry (n=83) or targeted next generation sequencing (n=7). Additionally, we correlated the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ with outcome. A substantial proportion (46.2%) of patients with invasive breast cancer also had an adjacent precursor lesion, mainly ductal carcinoma in situ (97.9%). The presence of lobular carcinoma in situ and columnar cell-like lesions were very low (<1%). In the subset of invasive breast cancer cases with adjacent ductal carcinoma in situ (n=83), a complete concordance was observed between the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status of both components. Next generation sequencing on a subset of cases with invasive breast cancer and adjacent ductal carcinoma in situ (n=4) showed identical genomic aberrations, including PIK3CA, GATA3, TP53, and MAP2K4 mutations. Next generation sequencing on a subset of cases with invasive breast cancer and an adjacent columnar cell-like lesion showed genomic concordance in two out of three patients. A multivariate Cox model for survival showed a trend that the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ was associated with a better overall survival, in particular in the Luminal B HER2+ subgroup. In conclusion, ductal carcinoma in situ is the most commonly observed precursor lesion in male breast cancer and its presence seems to be associated with a better outcome, in particular in Luminal B HER2+ cases. The rate of lobular carcinoma in situ and columnar cell-like lesions adjacent to male breast cancer is very low, but our findings support the role of columnar cell-like lesions as a precursor of male breast cancer.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBreast Neoplasms, MaleCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCarcinoma, LobularErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID28084333
OpenAlexW2578772391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.