Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28083891›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2017

Functional activation independently contributes to naming ability and relates to lesion site in post-stroke aphasia.

Laura M Skipper-Kallal, Elizabeth H Lacey, Shihui Xing, Peter E Turkeltaub

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Right hemisphere language network plasticity in aphasia.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026
    Article
  4. A Rapid fMRI Paradigm for Localisation of the Language Network.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Right Hemisphere Language Network Plasticity in Aphasia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Plasticity of the language system in children and adults.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura M Skipper-KallalDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Elizabeth H LaceyDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Shihui XingDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Peter E TurkeltaubDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Georgetown University · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · USThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science (GHUKL2TR000102 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MELLMAN, THOMAS A, VERBALIS, JOSEPH G · 2012 to 2014
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language network reorganization in aphasia may depend on the degree of damage in critical language areas, making it difficult to determine how reorganization impacts performance. Prior studies on remapping of function in aphasia have not accounted for the location of the lesion relative to critical language areas. They rectified this problem by using a multimodal approach, combining multivariate lesion-symptom mapping and fMRI in chronic aphasia to understand the independent contributions to naming performance of the lesion and the activity in both hemispheres. Activity was examined during two stages of naming: covert retrieval, and overt articulation. Regions of interest were drawn based on over- and under-activation, and in areas where activity had a bivariate relationship with naming. Regressions then tested whether activation of these regions predicted naming ability, while controlling for lesion size and damage in critical left hemisphere naming areas, as determined by lesion-symptom mapping. Engagement of the right superior temporal sulcus (STS) and disengagement of the left dorsal pars opercularis (dPOp) during overt naming was associated with better than predicted naming performance. Lesions in the left STS prevented right STS engagement and resulted in persistent left dPOp activation. In summary, changes in activity during overt articulation independently relate to naming outcomes, controlling for stroke severity. Successful remapping relates to network disruptions that depend on the location of the lesion in the left hemisphere. Hum Brain Mapp 38:2051-2066, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Brain MappingNamesAdultAgedAphasiaBrainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMental RecallMiddle AgedOxygenOxygenaphasiafMRIlanguage productionnamingstroke

Identifiers

PMID28083891
PMCPMC6867020
OpenAlexW2577216720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.