Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28083630›Full record

ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2018

[Teaching medical students informed consent].

I Schleicher, S H van der Mei, J Mika, J G Kreuder

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Psychotropic Medication Informed Consent: A Cross-Specialty Role-Playing Skill Builder.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

I SchleicherKlinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Sportmedizin, Agaplesion Evangelisches Krankenhaus Mittelhessen in Gießen, Gießen, Deutschland. iris.schleicher@ortho.med.uni-giessen.de.
S H van der MeiKlinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Gießen, Gießen, Deutschland.
J MikaKlinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, operative Notaufnahme, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Gießen, Gießen, Deutschland.
J G KreuderStudiendekanat des Fachbereichs Humanmedizin, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Gießen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesTeaching competencies in communication are important for medical education, but implementation in the surgical curriculum is still deficient. Communication during informed consent is one main issue. The aim of the study was to implement a reproducible teaching module for informed consent, which closely represents reality. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn the existing practical surgical course we implemented a module for practising communication during surgical informed consent with the help of standardized patients and feedback rounds. The outcome was assessed during a clinical examination and the students evaluated the module.

resultsThe module was evaluated by the students positively and deemed helpful for their later work as a doctor. The outcome at clinical examination was 63% (mean) for content and structure of the informed consent and 92% for competency in communication.

conclusionFor improving the quality of informed consent, teaching competencies in communication during informed consent should be implemented in the curriculum of medical studies, but legal and content-based aspects should not be ignored.

Indexed as

CurriculumInformed ConsentCommunicationEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsStudents, MedicalTeachingCommunicationInformed consentMedical conversationStandardized patientsSurgical education

Identifiers

PMID28083630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.