ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2017
[Isolated limb perfusion for liposarcoma : Histopathological response and subgroup analysis after TNF melphalan-based ILP].
Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) and melphalan-based isolated limb perfusion (TM-ILP) is one of the most effective treatment modalities for unresectable soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities. Liposarcomas (LS) are a large and heterogeneous subgroup of STS with different biological behavior and prognoses. The aim of this study was to evaluate LS and the different subentities with respect to their responsiveness towards TM-ILP.
methodsWe matched our ILP database with our pathology database to identify patients who received TM-ILP due to STS followed by resection of the residual tumor. We identified 126 patients who matched these inclusion criteria. In this patient group we identified 24 patients with a LS. Histopathological regression was assessed from all resection specimens and was compared between groups: LS vs. non-LS and for myxoid and non-myxoid LS subgroups.
resultsThere were no significant differences in the overall tumor regression comparing non-LS (median 95%, mean 77%) and LS (median 90%, mean 74%). For the subgroup analysis, a higher grade of regression after TM-ILP was found in myxoid-LS (median 95%, mean 79% ± 31.5) compared to the non-myxoid LS (median 75%, mean 72% ± 24.6). Atypical lipomatous tumors (ALT) were less responsive to TM-ILP treatment (median 40%, mean 40%).
conclusionThe histopathological response of LS toward TM-ILP is equally good compared to non-lipomatous STS. Myxoid LS seem to have a tendency towards a better response to TM-ILP compared to non-myxoid LS and ALT showed the lowest response rate in the liposarcoma subgroup. Furthermore, we found that TM-ILP seems to facilitate successful R0 resection. Due to the low number of cases in the subgroups we advocate further research on this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.