Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28083522›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health research2016

Monitoring Polypharmacy in Healthcare Systems Through a Multi-Setting Survey: Should We Put More Attention on Long Term Care Facilities?

Luca Arnoldo, Giovanni Cattani, Piergiorgio Cojutti, Federico Pea, Silvio Brusaferro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Special Considerations for Colorectal Surgery in the Elderly IBD Patient.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luca ArnoldoDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine.
Giovanni CattaniDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine.
Piergiorgio CojuttiInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology , Complex Local Health Unit, Udine, Italy.
Federico PeaInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology , Complex Local Health Unit, Udine, Italy.
Silvio BrusaferroDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolypharmacy is a main issue of patient safety in all healthcare settings (i.e. increase adverse drug reactions and incidence of drug-drug interactions, etc.). The main object of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of polypharmacy and the appropriateness of drugs prescriptions in the regional health system (RHS) of Friuli Venezia-Giulia Region, Italy. DESIGN AND

methodsWe carried out a point prevalence study in May 2014; 1582 patients ≥65 years were included from: 14 acute hospitals, 46 Long Term Care Facilities (LTCFs) and 42 general practitioners' (GPs) clinics. Data analysis included the evaluation of

resultsPatients in therapy with 10 drugs or more were 13.5%: 15.2% in hospitals, 9.7% in GPs' clinics and 15.6% in LTCFs. According to Beers criteria we identified 1152 PIPs that involved globally almost half of patients (46.0%): 41.9% in hospitals, 59.6% in LTCFs and 37.0% in GP's clinics. The 53.9% of patients received at least one mainly kidney excreted drug; for these patients the evaluation of serum creatinine was overall present in the 87.7% (747/852): 96.4% in hospital ones, 87.5% in GPs' clinics and 77.8% in LTCFs. LTCFs residents were significantly (P<0.05) more exposed to PIPs and less monitored for the renal function.

conclusionsA reliable estimation of the phenomenon in all the main healthcare settings is a necessary prerequisite to set tailored policies for facing polypharmacy within a RHS; the results showed the necessity to put a special attention on LTCFs.

Indexed as

DrugsElderlyHealth policyLCTFsPolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID28083522
PMCPMC5206774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.