Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28082968›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Early Recovery of

Ninalynn Daquigan, Christopher J Grim, James R White, Darcy E Hanes, Karen G Jarvis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative Evaluation of Enrichment and Selective Culture Strategies for DetectingVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. RapidFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Toward same-day detection ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Biosensors · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Low Diversity in Nasal Microbiome Associated WithOpen forum infectious diseases · 2021
    Article
  15. A Uniform Computational Approach Improved on Existing Pipelines to Reveal Microbiome Biomarkers of Nonresponse to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ninalynn DaquiganOffice of Applied Research and Safety Assessment, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationLaurel, MD, USA; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and TechnologyOak Ridge, TN, USA.
Christopher J GrimOffice of Applied Research and Safety Assessment, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration Laurel, MD, USA.
James R WhiteResphera Biosciences Baltimore, MD, USA.
Darcy E HanesOffice of Applied Research and Safety Assessment, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration Laurel, MD, USA.
Karen G JarvisOffice of Applied Research and Safety Assessment, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration Laurel, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Culture based methods are commonly employed to detect pathogens in food and environmental samples. These methods are time consuming and complex, requiring multiple non-selective and selective enrichment broths, and usually take at least 1 week to recover and identify pathogens. Improving pathogen detection in foods is a primary goal for regulatory agencies and industry.

Indexed as

16S rRNAFDA BAMmetagenomicsSalmonellaselective enrichmenttetrathionate broth

Identifiers

PMID28082968
PMCPMC5187357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.