Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28082967›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Stable and Variable Parts of Microbial Community in Siberian Deep Subsurface Thermal Aquifer System Revealed in a Long-Term Monitoring Study.

Yulia A Frank, Vitaly V Kadnikov, Sergey N Gavrilov, David Banks, Anna L Gerasimchuk, Olga A Podosokorskaya, Alexander Y Merkel, Nikolai A Chernyh, Andrey V Mardanov, Nikolai V Ravin and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Novel thermophilic generaFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yulia A FrankDepartment of Plant Physiology and Biotechnology, Tomsk State University Tomsk, Russia.
Vitaly V KadnikovFederal Research Centre (FRC) Biotechnology, Institute of Bioengineering Moscow, Russia.
Sergey N GavrilovFederal Research Centre (FRC) Biotechnology, Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) Moscow, Russia.
David BanksGlasgow and Holymoor Consultancy Ltd., Glasgow University Chesterfield, UK.
Anna L GerasimchukDepartment of Plant Physiology and Biotechnology, Tomsk State University Tomsk, Russia.
Olga A PodosokorskayaFederal Research Centre (FRC) Biotechnology, Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) Moscow, Russia.
Alexander Y MerkelFederal Research Centre (FRC) Biotechnology, Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) Moscow, Russia.
Nikolai A ChernyhFederal Research Centre (FRC) Biotechnology, Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) Moscow, Russia.
Andrey V MardanovFederal Research Centre (FRC) Biotechnology, Institute of Bioengineering Moscow, Russia.
Nikolai V RavinFederal Research Centre (FRC) Biotechnology, Institute of Bioengineering Moscow, Russia.
Olga V KarnachukDepartment of Plant Physiology and Biotechnology, Tomsk State University Tomsk, Russia.
Elizaveta A Bonch-OsmolovskayaFederal Research Centre (FRC) Biotechnology, Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) Moscow, Russia.
Russian Academy of Sciences · RUBioengineering Center · RUNational Research Tomsk State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this work was to study the diversity of microorganisms inhabiting a deep subsurface aquifer system in order to understand their functional roles and interspecies relations formed in the course of buried organic matter degradation. A microbial community of a deep subsurface thermal aquifer in the Tomsk Region, Western Siberia was monitored over the course of 5 years via a 2.7 km deep borehole 3P, drilled down to a Palaeozoic basement. The borehole water discharges with a temperature of ca. 50°C. Its chemical composition varies, but it steadily contains acetate, propionate, and traces of hydrocarbons and gives rise to microbial mats along the surface flow. Community analysis by PCR-DGGE 16S rRNA genes profiling, repeatedly performed within 5 years, revealed several dominating phylotypes consistently found in the borehole water, and highly variable diversity of prokaryotes, brought to the surface with the borehole outflow. The major planktonic components of the microbial community were

Indexed as

deep subsurfaceelement cycles and biogeochemical processesphylogenetic analysisthermophilic microbial communitiesWestern Siberia

Identifiers

PMID28082967
PMCPMC5187383
OpenAlexW2566416052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.