Trial reportWorld journal of gastroenterology2016
Irritable bowel syndrome symptom severity improves equally with probiotic and placebo.
Trial report in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on anxiety, depression, and sleep: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The effect and safety of probiotics on depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- European guideline on obesity care in patients with gastrointestinal and liver diseases - Joint European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism / United European Gastroenterology guideline.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022Guideline
- The efficacy of probiotics in the management of intra-oral halitosis: a systematic review.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy of Probiotics for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Probiotics, Prebiotics and Synbiotics in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Probiotics in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Prebiotics and probiotics for depression and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Efficacy of different probiotic protocols in irritable bowel syndrome: A network meta-analysis.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Effects of regulating intestinal microbiota on anxiety symptoms: A systematic review.General psychiatry · 2019Pooled it
- Systematic review: probiotics in the management of lower gastrointestinal symptoms - an updated evidence-based international consensus.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2018Pooled it
- The anxiolytic effect of probiotics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical and preclinical literature.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology AssociationPooled it
- The effects of AG1® supplementation on the gut microbiome of healthy adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2024Trial
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo determine the effects of
methodsIn this randomized triple-blind trial, adult IBS volunteers who were recruited according to Rome III criteria received 10
resultsA total of 340 of 391 randomized volunteers completed the trial. IBS-SSS improved over 12 wk of treatment in all treatment groups, decreasing by a mean ± SD of 44.0 ± 80.2, 50.8 ± 82.4, and 48.3 ± 72.2 in the placebo, active low-dose, and active high-dose groups, respectively. Similarly, secondary outcomes did not differ between treatment groups. However, in a post hoc analysis of volunteers with moderate to severe abdominal pain at baseline (VAS > 35/100), the treatment significantly reduced the sensation of abdominal pain. Pain scores fell by 20.8 ± 22.8, 29.4 ± 17.9, and 31.2 ± 21.9 in the placebo, active low-dose, and active high-dose groups, respectively (
conclusionNCFM alleviates moderate to severe abdominal pain, consistent with earlier observations of this strain mitigating visceral pain through increased analgesic receptor expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.