Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28082505›Full record

ArticleGenome announcements2017

Annotation of Fusarium graminearum (PH-1) Version 5.0.

Robert King, Martin Urban, Kim E Hammond-Kosack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome announcements, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Whole genome sequencing ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparative Genomics of EightInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Comparative Genomic Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert KingRothamsted Research, Harpenden, Herts, United Kingdom Robert.king@rothamsted.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1828-9490
Martin UrbanRothamsted Research, Harpenden, Herts, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2440-4352
Kim E Hammond-KosackRothamsted Research, Harpenden, Herts, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fusarium graminearum floral infections are a major risk to the global supply of safe cereal grains. We report updates to the PH-1 reference genome and significant improvements to the annotation. Changes include introduction of legacy annotation identifiers, new gene models, secretome and effectorP predictions, and inclusion of extensive untranslated region (UTR) annotations.

Identifiers

PMID28082505
PMCPMC5256205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.