Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28082389›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2017

An optimized, broadly applicable piggyBac transposon induction system.

Zongtai Qi, Michael Nathaniel Wilkinson, Xuhua Chen, Sumithra Sankararaman, David Mayhew, Robi David Mitra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A viral toolkit for recording transcription factor-DNA interactions in live mouse tissues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zongtai QiDepartment of Genetics and Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.
Michael Nathaniel WilkinsonDepartment of Genetics and Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.
Xuhua ChenDepartment of Genetics and Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.
Sumithra SankararamanDepartment of Genetics and Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.
David MayhewDepartment of Genetics and Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.
Robi David MitraDepartment of Genetics and Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
MAXIMIZING STUDENT DIVERSITY IN THE BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES AT WASHINGTON UNIVERSITYR25GM103757 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SKEATH, JAMES BENJAMIN · 2013 to 2022
$4.5M
AN INDUCIBLE MOLECULAR MEMORY SYSTEM TO RECORD TRANSIENT STATES OF CNS CELLSU01MH109133 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MITRA, ROBI D · 2015 to 2017
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM103757NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH109133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The piggyBac (PB) transposon has been used in a number of biological applications. The insertion of PB transposons into the genome can disrupt genes or regulatory regions, impacting cellular function, so for many experiments it is important that PB transposition is tightly controlled. Here, we systematically characterize three methods for the post-translational control of the PB transposon in four cell lines. We investigated fusions of the PB transposase with ERT2 and two degradation domains (FKBP-DD, DHFR-DD), in multiple orientations, and determined (i) the fold-induction achieved, (ii) the absolute transposition efficiency of the activated construct and (iii) the effects of two inducer molecules on cellular transcription and function. We found that the FKBP-DD confers the PB transposase with a higher transposition activity and better dynamic range than can be achieved with the other systems. In addition, we found that the FKBP-DD regulates transposon activity in a reversible and dose-dependent manner. Finally, we showed that Shld1, the chemical inducer of FKBP-DD, does not interfere with stem cell differentiation, whereas tamoxifen has significant effects. We believe the FKBP-based PB transposon induction will be useful for transposon-mediated genome engineering, insertional mutagenesis and the genome-wide mapping of transcription factor binding.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineCells, CulturedHEK293 CellsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansLigandsMiceMorpholinesReceptors, EstrogenRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTacrolimus Binding ProteinsTamoxifenTetrahydrofolate DehydrogenaseafimoxifeneDNA Transposable ElementsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsLigandsMorpholinesReceptors, EstrogenRecombinant Fusion ProteinsShield-1 compoundTacrolimus Binding ProteinsTamoxifenTetrahydrofolate DehydrogenaseTransposases

Identifiers

PMID28082389
PMCPMC5397163
OpenAlexW2576162457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.