Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28082263›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Effects of Radiation Exposure on the Cost-Effectiveness of CT Angiography and Perfusion Imaging in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

J Ivanidze, R A Charalel, I Shuryak, D Brenner, A Pandya, O N Kallas, K Kesavabhotla, A Z Segal, M S Simon, P C Sanelli

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Cost-Effectiveness Study of Initial Imaging Selection in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

J IvanidzeFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.I., R.A.C., O.N.K., K.K., P.C.S.) jai9018@nyp.org.ORCID 0000-0002-6470-5400
R A CharalelFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.I., R.A.C., O.N.K., K.K., P.C.S.).ORCID 0000-0001-9841-3839
I ShuryakDepartment of Radiology (I.S., D.B.), NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-9314-5708
D BrennerDepartment of Radiology (I.S., D.B.), NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-0926-1210
A PandyaDepartment of Health Policy and Management (A.P.), Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-6130-2286
O N KallasFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.I., R.A.C., O.N.K., K.K., P.C.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-2622-7479
K KesavabhotlaFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.I., R.A.C., O.N.K., K.K., P.C.S.).ORCID 0000-0001-5895-6935
A Z SegalNeurology (A.Z.S.).ORCID 0000-0001-8703-9108
M S SimonInternal Medicine and Public Health (M.S.S.), Weill Cornell Medical College, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-3256-1681
P C SanelliFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.I., R.A.C., O.N.K., K.K., P.C.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-9633-3699
Norwegian Womens Public Health Association · NONewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USNorthwell Health · USHarvard University · USZ Urology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeCT angiography and perfusion imaging is an important prognostic tool in the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The purpose of this study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of advanced imaging in patients with SAH, incorporating the risks of radiation exposure from CT angiography and CT perfusion imaging. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe risks of radiation-induced brain cancer and cataracts were incorporated into our established decision model comparing the cost-effectiveness of CT angiography and CT perfusion imaging and transcranial Doppler sonography in SAH. Cancer risk was calculated by using National Cancer Institute methodology. The remaining input probabilities were based on literature data and a cohort at our institution. Outcomes were expected quality-adjusted life years gained, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. One-way, 2-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

resultsCT angiography and CT perfusion imaging were the dominant strategies, resulting in both better health outcomes and lower costs, even when incorporating brain cancer and cataract risks. Our results remained robust in 2-way sensitivity analyses varying the prolonged latency period up to 30 years, with either brain cancer risk up to 50 times higher than the upper 95% CI limit or the probability of cataracts from 0 to 1. Results were consistent for scenarios that considered either symptomatic or asymptomatic patients with SAH. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed our findings over a broad range of selected input parameters.

conclusionsWhile risks of radiation exposure represent an important consideration, CT angiography and CT perfusion imaging remained the preferred imaging compared with transcranial Doppler sonography in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with SAH, with improved health outcomes and lower health care costs, even when modeling a significantly higher risk and shorter latency period for both cataract and brain cancer than that currently known.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCataractComputed Tomography AngiographyCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMalePerfusion ImagingQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRadiation ExposureSubarachnoid HemorrhageTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial

Identifiers

PMID28082263
PMCPMC7960010
OpenAlexW2578313243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.