Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28082261›Full record

Trial reportAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Hydrogel versus Bare Platinum Coils in Patients with Large or Recurrent Aneurysms Prone to Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Raymond, R Klink, M Chagnon, S L Barnwell, A J Evans, J Mocco, B H Hoh, A S Turk, R D Turner, H Desal and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Comparison between second generation HydroSoft coils and bare platinum coils for the treatment of large intracranial aneurysms.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for tiny ruptured intracranial aneurysms with low-profile visualized intraluminal support stents.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Macrophage activation in response to shape memory polymer foam-coated aneurysm occlusion devices.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

J RaymondFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.R., A.W., F.G., D.R.) jean.raymond@umontreal.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1978-4274
R KlinkLaboratory of Interventional Neuroradiology (R.K.), Research Centre of the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6129-3068
M ChagnonDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics (M.C.), Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2291-9566
S L BarnwellDepartment of Neurological Surgery (S.L.B.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
A J EvansDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging (A.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0002-2562-7462
J MoccoDepartment of Neurosurgery (J.M.), Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-5489-2524
B H HohDepartment of Neurosurgery (B.H.H.), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-4997-4469
A S TurkDepartment of Neurosurgery (A.S.T., R.D.T.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-8375-0410
R D TurnerDepartment of Neurosurgery (A.S.T., R.D.T.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-4533-3648
H DesalService de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionnelle (H.D.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4665-1461
D FiorellaCerebrovascular Center (D.F.), Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-2677-8780
S BracardDépartement de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionnelle (S.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9423-6660
A WeillFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.R., A.W., F.G., D.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-0281-6201
F GuilbertFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.R., A.W., F.G., D.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-7866-0493
S LanthierNeurosciences (S.L.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9762-5514
A J FoxDepartment of Medical Imaging (A.J.F.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5465-5801
T E DarsautDepartment of Surgery (T.E.D.), Division of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4662-1550
P M WhiteStroke Research Group (P.M.W.), Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6007-6013
D RoyFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.R., A.W., F.G., D.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-6066-4453

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeSome patients are at high risk of aneurysm recurrence after endovascular treatment: patients with large aneurysms (Patients Prone to Recurrence After Endovascular Treatment PRET-1) or with aneurysms that have previously recurred after coiling (PRET-2). We aimed to establish whether the use of hydrogel coils improved efficacy outcomes compared with bare platinum coils. MATERIALS AND

methodsPRET was an investigator-led, pragmatic, multicenter, parallel, randomized (1:1) trial. Randomized allocation was performed separately for patients in PRET-1 and PRET-2, by using a Web-based platform ensuring concealed allocation. The primary outcome was a composite of a residual/recurrent aneurysm, adjudicated by a blinded core laboratory, or retreatment, intracranial bleeding, or mass effect during the 18-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, mortality, and morbidity (mRS > 2). The hypothesis was that hydrogel would decrease the primary outcome from 50% to 30% at 18 months, necessitating 125 patients per group (500 for PRET-1 and PRET-2).

resultsThe trial was stopped once 250 patients in PRET-1 and 197 in PRET-2 had been recruited because of slow accrual. A poor primary outcome occurred in 44.4% (95% CI, 35.5%-53.2%) of those in PRET-1 allocated to platinum compared with 52.5% (95% CI, 43.4%-61.6%) of patients allocated to hydrogel (OR, 1.387; 95% CI, 0.838-2.295;

conclusionsCoiling of large and recurrent aneurysms is safe but often poorly effective according to angiographic results. Hydrogel coiling was not shown to be better than platinum.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAneurysm, RupturedEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedPlatinumRecurrenceRetreatmentTreatment OutcomeHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylatePlatinum

Identifiers

PMID28082261
PMCPMC7960015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.