Trial reportClinical therapeutics2017
Ranolazine and Microvascular Angina by PET in the Emergency Department: Results From a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Clinical therapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02052011 (Ranolazine and Microvascular Angina by PET in the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ranolazine and Microvascular Angina by PET in the Emergency Department (RAMP-ED)
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of enrolment criteria and treatment efficacy for microvascular angina.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of Oral Drugs on Coronary Microvascular Function in Patients Without Significant Stenosis of Epicardial Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Coronary Flow Reserve.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Review
- Treatment Modalities for Angina with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (ANOCA): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Ranolazine for improving coronary microvascular function in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Plasma Lipidomic Patterns in Patients with Symptomatic Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.Metabolites · 2021Article
- Use of Ranolazine for the Treatment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2021Review
- Efficacy of Ranolazine for Treatment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.CJC open · 2021Review
- The Role of Ranolazine for the Treatment of Residual Angina beyond the Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Management of chronic ischemic heart disease into internal medicine and geriatric departments in Italy.Internal and emergency medicine · 2020Article
- Quantitative Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function: Dynamic Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography, Positron Emission Tomography, Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCoronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a common but underdiagnosed cause of chest pain. Literature is scant regarding effective treatments. We explored the effect of ranolazine on coronary flow reserve (CFR) among symptomatic patients with CMD.
methodsThis pilot double-blinded randomized controlled trial included emergency department patients with chest pain and CMD admitted to an observation unit between June 2014 and November 2015. Participants were assessed by cardiac Rb-82 positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging at baseline and 30 days. CMD was defined as CFR <2 corrected for rate pressure product or <2.5 uncorrected, with no evidence of obstructive or nonobstructive coronary artery disease or calcification. Patients with infarction, hypertensive urgency, heart failure, or prescribed QTc-prolonging drugs were excluded. Participants were assigned to ranolazine or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. Primary outcome was change in CFR at 30 days.
findingsWe enrolled 31 patients (71% female, mean [SD] age 50 [6] years) with CMD (mean [SD] corrected CFR 1.6 [0.3]). Ranolazine improved CFR at 30 days by 17% (P = 0.005) compared with 0% with placebo (P = 0.67). However, there was no significant difference in the primary outcome as measured by mean change in CFR (0.27 ranolazine compared with 0.06 placebo; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.62). IMPLICATIONS: The emergency department offers a unique venue to diagnose CMD with acute symptoms. In an exploratory randomized controlled trial of symptomatic patients with CMD and no coronary artery disease, promising results were seem with ranolazine and CFR improving at 30 days. Large robust clinical trials are needed to verify improvement of CMD in a sex-specific model. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02052011.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.