Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28081719›Full record

Trial reportBMC infectious diseases2017

The influence of antibiotic prophylaxis on bacterial resistance in urinary tract infections in children with spina bifida.

Sebastiaan Hermanus Johannes Zegers, Jeanne Dieleman, Tjomme van der Bruggen, Jan Kimpen, Catharine de Jong-de Vos van Steenwijk

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Trends in Antimicrobial Susceptibility ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastiaan Hermanus Johannes ZegersMáxima Medical Center, Post box 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Jeanne DielemanMáxima Medical Center, Post box 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Tjomme van der BruggenUniversity Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jan KimpenWilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Catharine de Jong-de Vos van SteenwijkWilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLMáxima Medisch Centrum · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLWilhelmina Children's Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacterial resistance to antibiotics is an increasingly threatening consequence of antimicrobial exposure for many decades now. In urinary tract infections (UTIs), antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) increases bacterial resistance. We studied the resistance patterns of positive urinary cultures in spina bifida children on clean intermittent catheterization, both continuing and stopping AP.

methodsIn a cohort of 176 spina bifida patients, 88 continued and 88 stopped using AP. During 18 months, a fortnightly catheterized urine sample for bacterial pathogens was cultured. UTIs and significant bacteriuria (SBU) were defined as a positive culture with a single species of bacteria, respectively with and without clinical symptoms and leukocyturia. We compared the percentage of resistance to commonly used antibiotics in the isolated bacteria in both groups.

resultsIn a total of 4917 cultures, 713 (14.5%) had a positive monoculture, 54.3% of which were Escherichia coli. In the group stopping AP, the resistance percentage to antibiotics in UTI / SBU bacteria was lower than in the group remaining on AP, even when excluding the administered prophylaxis.

conclusionStopping antibiotic prophylaxis for urinary tract infections is associated with reduced bacterial resistance to antibiotics in children with spina bifida.

trial registrationISRCTN ISRCTN56278131 . Registered 20 December 2005.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisDeprescriptionsDrug Resistance, BacterialAdolescentAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriuriaChildEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleFluoroquinolonesGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansMaleAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsFluoroquinolonesNitrofurantoinPenicillinsTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID28081719
PMCPMC5228098
OpenAlexW2578661161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.